The Hague (Netherlands): People ride their bikes as environmental activists protest outside a court on Tuesday during a hearing in a case environmentalists and human rights groups have brought on against Royal Dutch Shell to force the firm to cut its reliance on fossil fuels.—Reuters
The Hague (Netherlands): People ride their bikes as environmental activists protest outside a court on Tuesday during a hearing in a case environmentalists and human rights groups have brought on against Royal Dutch Shell to force the firm to cut its reliance on fossil fuels.—Reuters

THE HAGUE: Environmental groups faced off against Shell before a Dutch court on Tuesday in a landmark bid to force the oil giant to meet emissions targets in the Paris climate accord.

The “historic” case being heard in The Hague was launched in 2019 by the Netherlands branch of Friends of the Earth, backed by 17,300 Dutch citizens who have registered as co-complainants.

Six other activist groups including the Dutch branches of Greenpeace and Action Aid are backing the lawsuit against the Anglo-Dutch multinational, whose failure to act “endangers the future of our children”, they said.

The 2015 Paris accords committed all nations to cut carbon emissions to limit warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels and encouraged them to go down to 1.5 degrees.

“Shell’s corporate policy is on a collision course with the global climate target,” Roger Cox, lawyer for the environmental NGOs, told the court.

The company “contributes to the realisation of great danger to humanity, human rights, future generations, the environment, and nature,” said Cox.

“The Shell Group is the 11th-largest industrial polluter in the world in terms of CO2 emissions,” he added.

“The company is one of a select group of 25 multinational companies that have caused more than half of global industrial greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years.”

Shell lawyer Dennis Horeman said the company was “already taking serious steps” to support the global transition away from the fossil fuels, and that the ultimate decision rested with governments.

Published in Dawn, December 2nd, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...
Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...