Prosecution identifies discrepancies in charge sheet against Capt Safdar

Published November 4, 2020
In this Oct 20 file photo, PML-N leader Captain (retired) Mohammad Safdar speaks to the media in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV
In this Oct 20 file photo, PML-N leader Captain (retired) Mohammad Safdar speaks to the media in Lahore. — DawnNewsTV

KARACHI: The prosecution on Tuesday pointed out discrepancies in the preliminary charge sheet submitted by police in the case pertaining to alleged breach of sanctity of the Quaid’s mazar registered against Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader retired Captain Safdar Awan.

Deputy district public prosecutor (DDPP) East Arif Sitai in his scrutiny note observed that the investigation officer (IO) of the case, SI Yousuf Narejo, did not record statements of the independent witnesses who were present at the place where the offence was alleged to have been committed.

Mr Awan, who is the husband of PML-N vice-president Maryam Nawaz, was taken into custody by police on October 19 from a Karachi hotel, where the couple was staying during their visit to the metropolis to attend the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) public gathering on the preceding day. He was granted bail by court hours after his arrest.

According to the FIR lodged by Waqas Khan, said to be a nephew of the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf leader Haleem Adil Sheikh, Mr Awan, his wife and cohorts violated the sanctity of the mausoleum of Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah by creating a ruckus inside and chanting fiery slogans.

Prosecutor Sitai said that the IO failed to get approval from his senior officers, as required under Section 181 (being a thug or belonging to a gang of dacoits, escape from custody, etc) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) before submitting the charge sheet. The IO also did not attach the complaint moved by the administration officer of the mausoleum board nor did he record the officer’s statement as per Section 161 of the CrPC, he added.

The prosecutor, however, seconded removal of Sections 506-B (criminal intimidation) and 427 (mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) from the FIR as neither Captain Safar used a weapon in the alleged offence nor did he damage any property.

He said that the IO should remove these discrepancies from the charge sheet and then re-file it in the court under Section 173 of the CrPC within three days.

Published in Dawn, November 4th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...