Terrorism section deleted against cleric in Justice Isa case

Published October 28, 2020
An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Tuesday deleted sections of Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) invoked against the Rawalpindi-based cleric Agha Iftikharuddin Mirza who had hurled threats and abuses at Justice Qazi Faez Isa and other judges of the Supreme Court. —Reuters/File
An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Tuesday deleted sections of Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) invoked against the Rawalpindi-based cleric Agha Iftikharuddin Mirza who had hurled threats and abuses at Justice Qazi Faez Isa and other judges of the Supreme Court. —Reuters/File

ISLAMABAD: An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Tuesday deleted sections of Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) invoked against the Rawalpindi-based cleric Agha Iftikharuddin Mirza who had hurled threats and abuses at Justice Qazi Faez Isa and other judges of the Supreme Court.

The threats were made in a video lecture that went viral on social media in June this year.

Following the incident, Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed took suo motu notice of this incident.

ATC Judge Shahrukh Arjumand deciding petition filed by the cleric ruled that the offence did not fall under the ambit of ATA. Subsequently, he referred the case back to the sessions court.

The cleric was facing proceedings under the Prevention of Electronic Crime Act 2016 (PECA) and section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) besides section 6 of the ATA.

However, after the deletion of the section 6 of ATA, the accused would be tried under the PECA and PPC.

Section 500 of the PPC suggests punishment that may extend to two years with fine for defamation.

During the hearing of the suo motu case, Mirza submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court which stated: “In a private meeting during conversation [he] unintentionally uttered some words against judiciary, honourable judges. [He] has lots of regrets, and feels sorry for those words; he seeks unconditional apology and surrenders himself at mercy of the honourable Supreme Court.”

Published in Dawn, October 28th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...
The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...