ATC verdict in Parliament House attack case on 29th

Published October 20, 2020
A view of Parliament. — AFP/File
A view of Parliament. — AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) of Islamabad has decided to announce verdict on Oct 29 in a petition seeking acquittal of Prime Minister Imran Khan in Parliament House attack case.

ATC Judge Raja Jawad Abbas Hassan during hearing of the application asked the defence counsel to submit written reply before the announcement of the decision.

The Judge, however, separated the case related to the acquittal of Mr Khan in PTV attack case.

The court will make a decision on the acquittal of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif in the case related to the violence during 2014 sit-in of the PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT).

On Monday, counsel representing PTI’s provincial minister Aleem Khan filed an application seeking exemption for the minister.

According to the application, Aleem Khan has tested positive for Covid-19 and could not appear in person. Judge sought the medical report from the counsel.

Regarding PTV attack case, the court asked the counsel for the prime minister to advance arguments on Nov 12.

The counsel argued that there is no material on record against Imran Khan and the case was fabricated against him for political reasons.

He said Imran Khan had specifically issued direction to the party workers to remain peaceful and not resort to violence during the sit-in.

He argued that the miscreants who attacked the Parliament House and PTV building were not workers of PTI and PAT. He referred the supplementary report into this incident that exonerated the PM and other leadership of the PTI.

Judge Abbas asked him to submit that supplementary repot before the court record.

He remarked that the prosecution itself expressed unwillingness to proceed in this case.

In May 2018, the ATC acquitted Mr Khan in the SSP Asmatullah Junejo torture case.

Police had invoked the ATA against PTI chief Imran Khan and its leaders Dr Arif Alvi, Asad Umar, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, Shafqat Mehmood, Ejaz Chaudhry and others for inciting violence during the sit-in.

As per the earlier stance of the prosecution, three people were killed and 26 injured while 60 were arrested. The prosecution had submitted 65 photos, sticks, cutters, etc, to the court to establish its case.

The prosecution was earlier of the view that the protest was not peaceful.

On Aug 31, 2014, PTI and Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT) workers marched towards Parliament House and Prime Minister House and clashed with police deployed on Constitution Avenue.

Published in Dawn, October 20th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.
Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....