ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench on Thursday declared the detention of retired Lt Col advocate Inamur Rahim illegal and ordered military authorities to release him immediately.

Justice Mirza Viqas Rauf of the LHC Rawalpindi bench issued the short order while deciding the petition seeking release of Mr Inam.

The court order stated: “The detention of Mr Inamur Rahim advocate with military authorities is declared illegal and unlawful. He shall be released forthwith.”

On Jan 3, Justice Rauf had admitted the petition filed against the detention of retired Lt Col Inamur Rahim who, according to the defence ministry, had been taken into custody under the Pakistan Army Act (PAA) for his alleged violation of the Official Secret Act.

The counsel for the federation informed the court that Section 13 of the PAA empowered the military to investigate retired officers.

However, advocate Ahsanuddin Sheikh, the counsel for Col Rahim’s family, argued that Section 13 could only be invoked in case a complaint against the retired officer had already been lodged. He pointed out that no complaint had ever been lodged against Col Rahim before his arrest for his alleged violation of the PAA.

Retired Brigadier Wasaf Khan Niazi, another counsel in this matter, cited different case laws in response to arguments of Additional Attorney General Sajid Ilyas Bhatti.

He said the Pakistan Army Act was clear about the arrest of a retired officer, whereas advocate Rahim had been taken into custody in violation of relevant sections of the PAA.

According to the FIR registered against the alleged kidnapping of the lawyer, Col Rahim had been picked up by unknown people from his residence in Askari 14, which is considered a secure locality in the garrison city.

The FIR states that Col Rahim had been asleep when unidentified individuals trespassed into his residence and forcibly kidnapped him, besides extending threats to family members. Since Dec 17, the whereabouts of Col Rahim were not known, but during the hearing of the petition, the defence ministry admitted that the lawyer was in its custody and being probed for his alleged violation of the Secret Act.

Published in Dawn, January 10th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Window dressing
Updated 17 Jun, 2025

Window dressing

Meanwhile, the provinces lack the resources and expertise to implement adaptation measures effectively.
No revenue effort
17 Jun, 2025

No revenue effort

WITH the ruling PML-N’s next budget unfolding large infrastructure schemes, and expenditure focusing on service...
Pomp and circumstance
17 Jun, 2025

Pomp and circumstance

THE sight of columns of tanks rolling down a boulevard, accompanied by troops goose-stepping in lockstep, was a...
Close the gap
Updated 16 Jun, 2025

Close the gap

Our imbalanced scorecard in the main shows that power development and prosperity reflect the shallowness of political claims.
Fiscal malfeasance
16 Jun, 2025

Fiscal malfeasance

IT is galling that, even in these times of economic distress, when hardship has pushed millions of ordinary...
Rochdale conviction
16 Jun, 2025

Rochdale conviction

THE recent conviction of seven men in the Rochdale grooming gang case is a hard-won moment of justice. The men, ...