ICJ urges Pakistan to revoke KP Actions Ordinance

Published September 29, 2019
The International Comm­ission of Jurists (ICJ) has denounced the promulgation of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Actions (in aid of civil power) Ordinance, 2019, by the governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on Aug 5 and expressed the apprehension that it could lead to serious human rights violations and miscarriage of justice, contrary to the purported aims of the measures. — Photo courtesy ICJ Facebook
The International Comm­ission of Jurists (ICJ) has denounced the promulgation of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Actions (in aid of civil power) Ordinance, 2019, by the governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on Aug 5 and expressed the apprehension that it could lead to serious human rights violations and miscarriage of justice, contrary to the purported aims of the measures. — Photo courtesy ICJ Facebook

KARACHI: The International Comm­ission of Jurists (ICJ) has denounced the promulgation of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Actions (in aid of civil power) Ordinance, 2019, by the governor of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on Aug 5 and expressed the apprehension that it could lead to serious human rights violations and miscarriage of justice, contrary to the purported aims of the measures.

“The ordinance is yet another example of Pakistan’s resort to ‘exceptional’ measures that are grossly incompatible with human rights protections, ostensibly to combat terrorism and other serious crime,” said ICJ’s Asia Director Frederick Rawski, according to a press release issued on Friday.

“Pakistan must reject this dangerous, oppressive, and counterproductive strategy and instead strengthen its judicial process and law enforcement in line with its domestic law and international human rights law obligations,” he added.

Says legislation may lead to serious rights violations and miscarriage of justice

The ICJ urged the Pakistan government to immediately revoke the ordinance and to review all national security legislation to ensure it is fully compatible with international human rights law and standards.

The press release said the ordinance gave sweeping powers to members of the armed forces including the power to detain people without charge or trial on a number of vaguely defined grounds where it appeared that such “internment” would be expedient for peace. Individuals might be detained for an unspecified period without any right to be brought before a court of law or to challenge the lawfulness of detention before a court, it added.

The ordinance is incompatible with “fundamental rights” guaranteed by the Constitution, as well as Pakistan’s international legal obligations, including under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the ICJ noted.

Article 9(4) of the ICCPR guarantees the right of all detainees to take proceedings before a court to challenge the lawfulness of their detention, and to be released if the court finds such detention unlawful.

Earlier in their review of Pakistan’s implementation of the ICCPR and the Convention against Torture (CAT) in 2017, the UN Human Rights Committee and the UN Committee against Torture had expressed concern about the Actions (in aid of civil power) Regulations in 2011, which were applicable in the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas and the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas, and recommended that Pakistan “review the Actions (in aid of civil power) Regulation, 2011 with a view to repealing it or bringing it into conformity with international standards”.

Mr Rawski said: “It is regrettable that not only did Pakistan flout these recommendations of the UN Committees, but that it extended the scope of the regulations.” He added this step also called into question Pakistan’s pledge for election to the UN Human Rights Council in 2017, where Pakistan had “firmly resolved to uphold, promote and safeguard universal human rights and fundamental freedoms for all”.

Published in Dawn, September 29th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.