Fate of TJP leaders in NAs unclear

Published January 14, 2002

GILGIT, Jan 13: Following the government’s decision to ban some sectarian organizations, the fate of Northern Areas Deputy Chief Executive Fida Mohammad Nashad, advisers Imran Nadeem and Sheikh Ghulam Haider Hajfi, and three other members of Northern Areas Legislative Council (NALC) is unclear.

Fida Nashad contested the NALC elections in November 1999 as an independent candidate and subsequently joined Tehrik-i-Jaferia Pakistan to become deputy chief executive as a result of a deal with the TJP.

Imran Nadeem and Sheikh Ghulam Haider Najfi won the NALC elections on TJP tickets in Shigar and Nagar-II respectively and were made advisers to the NAs Chief Executive Abbas Sarfraz Khan in August 2001.

Gilgit District Council Chairman Kalbe Ali won as a TJP candidate from Nagar constituency.

There are more than a dozen TJP district councillors in Gilgit and Baltistan.

Now, as the government has banned TJP, it is not clear whether the Tehrik’s councillors will be allowed to hold public offices.

Legal experts are of the view that after the banning of TJP and other sectarian organizations, the TJP councillors will have to resign from their public offices or shun their affiliation with it, as they cannot remain members of a banned party.

However, there is no Sipah-i-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) councillor in the Northern Areas.

When contacted, Fida Nashad said that he had contested the elections as an independent candidate and he would continue to function under the Legal Framework Order.

He said the decision would not be applicable on NALC members if they did not participate in TJP activities.

He said that he and other NALC members were bound to follow the government’s decision and refused to comment on the ban.

He said that he had not discussed the situation with Northern Areas Chief Executive Abbas Sarfraz Khan.

MIXED REACTION: Following the imposition of ban of TJP, SSP, Tanzim Nifaz Shariat-i-Mohammadi and other sectarian parties, leaders of TJP and SSP have discontinued their routine activities.

Mixed reaction was received on the president’s speech on Saturday.

A lawyer, Ehsan Ali, said that the president had changed his strategy on the Kashmir but the principal stance was the same.

He said that withdrawal of the troops from both parts of Kashmir would have helped Kashmiri people decide about the solution to their problems but Pakistan and India were not ready to do so.

TJP leaders said they would resort to legal action against the ban on their party.

Some activists of Pakistan People’s Party demanded fresh elections for the NALC.

However, some experts said that they were not sure if the ban would be extended to the Northern Areas.

They said that the ban could create a political vacuum in the Northern Areas.

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...