Transfer of ‘fake’ accounts case to Islamabad in accordance with SC order, rules SHC

Published April 12, 2019
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website
The bench rules March 15 order was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court. — Photo courtesy of SHC website

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) has ruled that the order of a banking court transferring a ‘fake’ accounts and money laundering case against co-chairman of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Asif Ali Zardari, his sister and others to Islamabad was in accordance with the Supreme Court’s judgement.

On April 2, a two-judge SHC bench headed by Chief Justice Ahmed Ali M. Shaikh dismissed a set of applications moved by Mr Zardari and others against the banking court’s order, through a short order.

According to the detailed order issued on Thursday, the main thrust of the arguments advanced by the lawyers for the applicants was that under the orders of the apex court, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) was not authorised to get the case in question (FIR No. 04/18) transferred from a banking court in Karachi to an accountability court at Islamabad and the allegations contained in the FIR did not constitute an offence falling within the ambit of the NAB Ordinance.

While reproducing some parts of the apex court’s Jan 7 judgement, the SHC ruled: “After examining the judgement of Honourable Supreme Court, we do not see any ambiguity in the said judgment which would lead us to conclude that the transfer of the case pending before the special court (arising out of FIR No. 04/2018) was excluded from the ambit of the judgement when it was ordered that a reference by the NAB be filed before the accountability court, Islamabad.”

Referring to the reliance on Article 187(2) by the lawyers for applicants, the SHC bench said the same was not applicable in the current scenario.

“As we have concluded that the transfer of the case arising out of FIR No. 04/2018 and the filing of reference at Islamabad is a consequence of the material placed before the NAB and directions of the Honourable Supreme Court,” it added.

The bench also observed that the March 15 order of the banking court was a speaking and reasoned order, which did not warrant interference by this court.

The former president, his sister Faryal Talpur, detained chairman of Omni Group Anwar Majeed, his sons, former chairman of the Pakistan Stock Exchange Hussain Lawai and others had challenged the March 15 trial court order before the SHC.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) had named Mr Zardari, his sister Ms Talpur, Anwar Majeed, his sons and over 10 others as suspects in the interim charge sheet filed before the banking court in FIR No. 04/18 in August last year for the alleged money laundering of over Rs4 billion through fake bank accounts.

Published in Dawn, April 12th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price crash
Updated 20 May, 2024

Wheat price crash

What the government has done to Punjab’s smallholder wheat growers by staying out of the market amid crashing prices is deplorable.
Afghan corruption
20 May, 2024

Afghan corruption

AMONGST the reasons that the Afghan Taliban marched into Kabul in August 2021 without any resistance to speak of ...
Volleyball triumph
20 May, 2024

Volleyball triumph

IN the last week, while Pakistan’s cricket team savoured a come-from-behind T20 series victory against Ireland,...
Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.