Four penalised for misleading court

Published March 22, 2019
The LHC imposes a cost of Rs50,000 each on four petitioners for trying to mislead the court.— Photo courtesy of LHC
The LHC imposes a cost of Rs50,000 each on four petitioners for trying to mislead the court.— Photo courtesy of LHC

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court has imposed a cost of Rs50,000 each on four petitioners for trying to mislead the court with regard to a litigation on appointment of vice chancellor at University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.

Prof Dr Ijaz Ahmad, Prof Dr Abdullah and two others had filed a petition questioning the process of the recruitment of the vice chancellor before a search committee. They claimed that the search committee deviated from directions issued by the high court in a related judgment.

Dismissing the petition, Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan observed that the record of the case showed no violation of the court’s judgment on the part of the search committee.

“It is, therefore, manifest that this writ petition is a classic example of abuse of process of law, as it is devoid of any merit or question of law which could be raised afresh before this court,” said the judge in his written order and dismissed the petition with cost of Rs50,000 to be paid by each petitioner in the national exchequer.

Published in Dawn, March 22nd, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.