Supreme Court acquits man of involvement in rape case

Published March 14, 2019
Hussain was convicted by a trial court but partially cleared of the charges by the PHC, which ruled that he had abetted the crime. — Creative Commons/File
Hussain was convicted by a trial court but partially cleared of the charges by the PHC, which ruled that he had abetted the crime. — Creative Commons/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court has acquitted a man accused of involvement in a rape case by giving him “the benefit of the doubt”, stating that the case was of a “peculiar” nature.

The suspect, Hussain, was nominated in an incident on May 12, 2014, in which a woman was raped by two people in a moving car in Mansehra. The rapists were convicted, and their conviction was upheld by the Peshawar High Court (PHC) last year.

Hussein, meanwhile, was convicted by a trial court, but partially cleared of the charges by the PHC, which ruled that he had abetted the crime. He then appealed the high court order before the SC.

The order issued on Wednesday by a three-member bench of the SC, headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, said: “The alleged victim was a grown up girl and there is no evidence available on the record to establish that she had tried to escape from the motorcar or that the appellant had in any manner foiled her attempt in that regard.”

“In these peculiar circumstances of the case there are serious doubts available vis-à-vis the allegation of abetment levelled against the appellant. It could well be that the appellant knew that some sexual activity was taking place on the back seat of the motorcar and that he had kept quiet.”

The court observed that “we have not been able to answer that question in the positive.”

Subsequently, the bench held: “In this view of the matter the appellant has to be extended the benefit of doubt.

“This appeal is, therefore, allowed, the conviction and sentence of the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge by extending the benefit of doubt to him.”

Published in Dawn, March 14th, 2019

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...