LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Thursday ordered a judicial inquiry into the Sahiwal killings as the Punjab government came up with no recommendation for the constitution of a judicial commission till the report of a joint investigation team (JIT) formed to probe the tragic incident.

During the hearing of multiple petitions by the court, Additional Attorney General Chaudhry Ishtiaq A. Khan presented a letter of the Punjab home department written to the federal government. It revealed that constitution of a judicial commission had not been recommended for want of JIT report on the incident.

At this, Chief Justice Sardar Mohammad Shamim Khan observed that the matter was of grave importance and required to be dealt with due diligence. Therefore, he directed the Sahiwal sessions judge to depute a judicial magistrate for conducting judicial inquiry into the killings and concluding it in 30 days.

JIT head Ijaz Hussain Shah informed the court that the statements of eyewitnesses Mohammad Jalil, Mohammad Afzal, Umair Khalil and Dr Nadeem Abbas had been recorded under Section 161 of CrPC (Code of Criminal Procedure). However, he was unable to satisfy the court about the recording of statements of all witnesses.

The chief justice regretted that the JIT had not bothered to record statements of all eyewitnesses provided by the court.

Mr Shah undertook to record statements of all the witnesses who would appear or produce before the JIT.
The court adjourned the proceedings till March 5.

In addition to pro bono petitions filed by two lawyers, Mohammad Jalil, brother of Khalil who was gunned down along with his wife and a teenage daughter in the Sahiwal ‘encounter’, also challenged the formation of the JIT. The brother of victim Zeeshan also filed a petition.

All the petitioners mainly questioned impartiality of the JIT formed by the Punjab government and doubted its capacity to hold the real culprits accountable. They submitted that formation of a judicial commission was critical due to non-seriousness and callous conduct of the government to provide justice to the victims.

The petitioners asked the court to set aside the JIT and order constitution of a judicial commission under Section 3 of the Punjab Tribunals of Inquiry Ordinance 1969 or under Section 3 of the Pakistan Commissions of Inquiry Act 2017 to dig out facts of the Sahiwal incident.

At a previous hearing, the chief justice had suggested to the victims’ family to have a judicial inquiry conducted by a judicial magistrate as its report could be used in the trial, whereas the report of a judicial commission would not have such effectiveness.

Published in Dawn, February 15th, 2019

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...