US-Russia treaty

Published
6

ONE of the most dangerous aspects of the Cold War was the ever-present threat of nuclear conflict between the US and the Soviet Union.

Though both superpowers thankfully never actually had a nuclear exchange, there were a few close calls (eg the Cuban Missile Crisis) that highlighted the threat the weapons posed to world peace.

While the threat of nuclear war subsided considerably after the fall of the USSR, the current chaos in the international sphere has sparked fears that a renewed arms race between the US and Russia may be in the works. This is thanks in part to the haphazard policies of the Trump administration.

Explore: US calls for Russian, Chinese nuclear transparency

Last week, the US announced it was ‘suspending’ the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, negotiated with the Soviets in 1987, and would withdraw from it entirely in six months if Moscow continued with its ‘violations’ of the agreement. Russia has replied in kind, with the Kremlin saying it is also suspending the accord and considering a withdrawal from the pact.

Brinksmanship may well be the new normal in international politics. However, when this brinksmanship entails the possible use of nuclear weapons, the entire global community — as well as saner elements in Washington and Moscow — must step in to prevent sabre-rattling between these nuclear-armed foes deteriorating into something more sinister. Instead of jettisoning such treaties, they must be strengthened to prevent the menace of nuclear weapons from spreading.

As some experts have noticed, the US move may encourage China to ramp up its own weapons programme.

As it is, the world today is a very dangerous place; the last thing needed is a fresh arms race involving global nuclear powers.

Read more: Russia plans new missile systems

While US-Russia relations are going through a low phase, it would be a bad idea to return to the mutual hostility seen during the Cold War. Mr Trump’s presidency has been marked by the US withdrawing from a number of bilateral or multilateral deals — the Paris climate accord, the Iran nuclear deal, and now the treaty with Russia.

Washington is sending the message to the international community that it is fickle about honouring its global commitments and can withdraw from them anytime on the slightest pretext.

Read more: Nuclear chief says Iran exploring new process for uranium enrichment

In the interest of global stability, sane voices within the American establishment must provide better counsel to Mr Trump and advise him to work with the Russians towards saving the nuclear treaty, instead of pursuing the path of confrontation with Moscow.

Published in Dawn, February 6th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Restructuring plans
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Restructuring plans

The primary reason for governance failure in Pakistan is not the geographical size of the existing provinces but the reluctance of provincial capitals to empower local bodies.
Polluted priorities
Updated 29 Oct, 2026

Polluted priorities

Enforcement must continue, but decisions should follow evidence, not the visibility of machinery on city roads.
Continuing genocide
29 Oct, 2026

Continuing genocide

FOR the people of Gaza, despite the ‘ceasefire’ reached last October, the genocide never really ceased. This ...
Regional security
Updated 28 Oct, 2026

Regional security

Iran and the Makkah pact states should pledge not to let external actors use their soil to launch aggression against each other.
Rate hike
28 Oct, 2026

Rate hike

THE SBP’s decision to raise its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12pc was largely expected. It is also justified...
Press solidarity
28 Oct, 2026

Press solidarity

PAKISTAN’S journalists have seldom lacked organisations speaking in defence of press freedom. What has been ...