ISLAMABAD: A last-ditch effort to avoid an anti-encroachment operation in Bahria Enclave, a housing project of Bahria Town, failed after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) did not issue any restraining order against the drive.

Bahria Enclave went into litigation with the Capital Development Authority (CDA) after the revenue department of the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) carried out a demarcation and pointed out that Bahria Town had encroached on 510 kanals.

A civil court on Sept 14 issued a stay order against the operation but it was withdrawn a few days later after the CDA pursued the case through its legal adviser Kashif Ali Malik.

Bahria Enclave then filed an appeal against the civil court order in the additional district and sessions court which granted a stay. The stay was again withdrawn after the civic agency rebutted the contents of the appeal.

The housing society even failed to obtain a stay order in the IHC when the CDA commenced its anti-encroachment drive to retrieve the 510 kanals last week. However, the civic agency deferred the operation till Monday.

On Monday, identical petitions were filed by the residents of Bahria Enclave in the IHC requesting the court to direct the CDA to stop the operation.

Advocate Qamar Afzal, the counsel for the petitioners, argued that they were bona fide purchasers but were being condemned unheard.

The CDA legal adviser pointed out that the IHC in the case of M/S BNP had observed that the buyers cannot file petitions in such a dispute between the civic agency and the private developers.

The petitioners’ counsel requested the court to issue a restraining order against the operation. However, Justice Aamer Farooq did not accept the request and issued notice to the civic agency for Tuesday.

Published in Dawn, December 4th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...
The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...