THE HAGUE: Russia clashed bitterly with the West on Monday as it tried to block the world chemical arms watchdog’s new ability to attribute blame for attacks like those in Syria and Salisbury.

Accusations of hypocrisy and lying erupted as the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons debated how to move ahead with plans agreed in June to give the body new teeth.

Backed by China and Iran, Russia called last-minute votes on the OPCW’s budget and on setting up an “expert group” to scrutinise the OPCW’s new role in pointing the finger for toxic weapons attacks.

But the United States and Britain furiously accused them of trying to “turn back the clock of history”, and said the work to attribute blame for attacks in Syria should start as planned early next year.

The West pushed through the new powers after a string of chemical incidents in Syria, as well as a nerve agent attack on Russian former double agent Sergei Skripal in the British city of Salisbury in March.

Russian envoy Alexander Shulgin said Western claims of chemical weapons use by Damascus and Moscow were “out and out lies” and an excuse for “raining down missiles” on Syria.

He said the June decision was “illegitimate” and went beyond the Chemical Weapons Convention, the 1997 agreement to rid the world of toxic arms, under which the OPCW was set up.

Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad denied his country had ever used chemical weapons, in a fierce broadside at the western allies.

“You have taught people to use chemical weapons, you have used chemical weapons in the first two world wars.” he said. “Where is your morality? This is sheer hypocrisy and sheer lies.” US Ambassador Kenneth Ward said Russia’s claims that the OPCW’s new powers were illegitimate were “pungent hypocrisy”, and warned against allowing a “new era of chemical weapons use to take hold”.

“What have they done for the last few years but to connive with their Syrian ally to bury the truth of what has happened in Syria, along with the dead killed by the use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime,” Ward said.

“And as if that wasn’t bad enough, Salisbury comes along.” Britain accused Russia of carrying out the Salisbury attack using a Soviet-era chemical called Novichok and the West has since imposed a series of sanctions on Moscow.

British envoy to the OPCW Peter Wilson called any attempt to limit the watchdog’s power to attribute blame for chemical attacks “unacceptable”.

Published in Dawn, November 20th, 2018