Federal cabinet role in ECL challenged

Published October 20, 2018
The role of the federal cabinet in placing or removing names from the Exit Control List (ECL) has been challenged in the Lahore High Court for being an uncalled for step. — File Photo
The role of the federal cabinet in placing or removing names from the Exit Control List (ECL) has been challenged in the Lahore High Court for being an uncalled for step. — File Photo

LAHORE: The role of the federal cabinet in placing or removing names from the Exit Control List (ECL) has been challenged in the Lahore High Court for being an uncalled for step.

Through a writ petition, lawyer Munir Ahmad questions the procedure for inclusion or exclusion of names from the ECL saying the Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981 needs to be regulated in view of fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution.

He pleads that the Ministry of Interior’s working is very slow and outdated as most of times when courts permitted exclusion of name of a person from the ECL temporarily or permanently the ministry delays strategy as it always presents a summary regarding inclusion or exclusion of name from the ECL before the federal cabinet for approval.

Sometime, the petitioner contends, the federal cabinet keeps sitting on such summaries despite directions issued by courts for inclusion or exclusion of names from the ECL. He argues that the courts’ directions need to be implemented in letter and spirit by the interior ministry without the role of the cabinet.

The lawyer argues that in view of settled laws to place or delete someone’s name from the ECL, the power rests with the federal government and that power has to be exercised by secretary interior or any subordinate officer.

In any case the federal cabinet has no power to interfere in this matter as it is independent and exclusive power of the interior ministry, he adds.

The petitioner asks the court to declare that exercise of authority and jurisdiction through cabinet, which is abusing the power of federal government in pursuance of provision of the Exit from Pakistan (Control) Ordinance, 1981 are not only illegal but without jurisdiction and beyond the scope of the Constitution.

He pleads that directions may be given to the interior ministry to process each and every case within the scope of the ECL Ordinance, without any hindrance or interruption by the federal cabinet.

He also asks the court to summon policy details from the government as well as procedure regarding the process of inclusion or exclusion of names of citizens from the ECL.

Published in Dawn, October 20th, 2018

Opinion

Four hundred seats?

Four hundred seats?

The mix of divisive cultural politics and grow­th-oriented economics that feeds Hindu middle-class ambition and provides targeted welfare are key ingredients in the BJP’s political trajectory.

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.