Suspect gets bail in transgender person murder case

Published October 12, 2018
Peshawar High Court. — File Photo
Peshawar High Court. — File Photo

PESHAWAR: A single-member Peshawar High Court bench on Thursday granted bail to a man suspected of being involved in murdering a transgender person and dismembering the body here lately.

Justice Roohul Amin Khan accepted the bail petition of suspect Mohammad Farooq asking him to deposit two surety bonds of Rs200,000 each.

It ruled that the order won’t have any bearing on the murder case against the prime suspect, Sadaqat, as the role of suspect Farooq in the crime was different from his.

Sajid was killed, body dismembered in August

The transgender person, Sajid alias Nazo, was killed in the jurisdiction of Pishtakhara police station on Aug 16.

The local police claimed that SHO Ijazullah along with other police officials during routine patrolling saw a young man put a shopping bag in a rickshaw on Bara Road and recovered pieces of a human body from the bag.

They said the man, Mohammad Farooq, told them that the body parts were of a transgender person, Sajid alias Nazo, and that his friend, Sadaqat, killed him before chopping the body into pieces with a dagger and an axe.

The police insisted that on the pointation of the arrested man, Sadaqat was held and more body parts were recovered from him.

They also claimed to have recovered a pistol from Sadaqat, who reportedly disclosed that he had hid the dagger and axe in a nearby field.

Abdul Kareem Khan, lawyer for the petitioner, denied any recovery from his client and insisted that the petitioner wasn’t involved in the murder.

He also said his client didn’t record confessional statement with the magistrate.

The lawyer said the police didn’t assign any role to his client in the murder.

He said even if the police’s version of the case was believed to be true, the petitioner could be charged only with concealing evidence.

The lawyer said the police didn’t mention no independent witness while claiming recovery of a shopping bag with human organs from his client.

The bench observed that it appeared from the records that an iota of evidence had not been collected during investigation to show the petitioner’s involvement in the murder and therefore, sharing his common intention, abetment or premeditation with Sadaqat in the murder was a debatable question making his case to the extent of murder arguable for the purpose of bail.

Published in Dawn, October 12th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.