ISLAMABAD: The Sup­reme Court on Monday rejected a petition seeking Dr Aafia Siddiqui’s repatriation after it was informed that the prisoner undergoing jail term in the United States was alive.

“No case has been made out under Article 4 of the Constitution,” obser­ved Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar before dismissing the petition moved by Dr Aafia’s sister Dr Fawzia Siddiqui highlighting the plight of Pakistani prisoners languishing in foreign jails.

At the last hearing on June 7, the Supreme Court had ordered the federal government to contact the US authorities and ascertain the whereabouts of Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

The directive was issued against the backdrop of concerns expressed by certain quarters about the news of her death.

On Monday, Advocate Dawood Ghazanfer, representing Dr Fawzia, argued before the court that Pakistani citizens in foreign countries also had fundamental rights.

The chief justice observed that the Pakistani courts had no role in foreign lands, adding that if Dr Aafia was incarcerated in the US, the case should be made out there only.

Dr Fawzia had also pleaded before the court that she wanted proof about the well-being of her sister, requesting the apex court to order the authorities concerned to bring her back to the country.

The chief justice observed that the Supreme Court could not issue directives to an independent country.

In her petition, Dr Fawzia had deplored that the government had devised no mechanism on how to repatriate Pakistanis who were in a miserable condition and that the miseries of Pakistani prisoners detained abroad for whatever reasons were very painful and infringement of their basic human rights.

The petitioner had requested the court to direct the government to declare a moratorium on prisoner transfer to the US unless Dr Aafia was returned.

She had also requested the court to order the government to extend her all possible cooperation and assistance in obtaining US visa to visit and meet her sister and constitute a competent and independent medical team to examine Dr Aafia’s mental and physical health.

Published in Dawn, June 26th, 2018

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...