IHC judge asks journalist if he wants to contest contempt proceedings

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday gave two days to senior journalist and anchor Matiullah Jan to decide whether he would tender an apology or contest the contempt of court proceedings against him.

The judge was hearing a case against an episode of the talk show ‘Apna Apna Gareban’ — hosted by Mr Jan on Feb 5 on Waqt Television — which examined allegations that lawyers had encroached upon a football ground in Islamabad’s F-8 sector.

Chief Executive Officer of Waqt TV Rameeza Majeed Nizami, anchorperson Jan and the production team of the programme appeared before the court.

On the court’s directive, the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority officials played a recording of the programme in the courtroom.

The programme had aired a sound bite of a lawyer from four years ago where he claimed that Justice Siddiqui had allowed lawyers to construct chambers on the football ground.

Though the anchorperson in the same video clip rebutted the lawyer’s claim, saying that Justice Siddiqui never allowed such construction, the judge observed that the journalist had unnecessarily dragged his name in the controversy.

Being the administrative judge of the sessions court of Islamabad, Justice Siddiqui had ordered an inquiry of a senior civil judge for issuing a stay order in favour of lawyers involved in the football ground case.

He declared the stay order was unlawful and observed the anchorperson had used derogatory language for Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar. “It is only the appellate court which can decide if the order is lawful or otherwise,” the judge remarked.

The court observed that an intentional effort was made in the programme to malign the judiciary, disgrace the office of the honourable CJP and the court.

CEO Nizami and the producer’s counsel pleaded they wanted to tender an unconditional apology to the court. However, Mr Jan said he needed some time to consult his lawyer to decide if he wanted to contest the case or issue an apology.

The IHC bench then granted him time in this regard.

The court also exempted Ms Nizami’s appearance for the next hearing and adjourned the case till Feb 19.

Published in Dawn, February 17th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

The jurisdiction of the two courts and a mechanism for settling disputes between them should be spelt out in law, not left to judges to fight over.
Growing crisis
Updated 15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

Calling population growth a national emergency is easy. Ensuring that the response reaches the people who need it is the real challenge.
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...