Mumbai attacks case: FO spokesperson, foreign secretary appear before ATC

Published
1

An Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Islamabad summoned Foreign Office spokesperson Dr Mohammad Faisal and Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua for a hearing of the ongoing case of the 2008 Mumbai attacks, DawnNews reported on Wednesday.

Both Janjua and Dr Faisal appeared before the court on Wednesday. Janjua told the court that high-level meetings between authorities will be held soon, where developments regarding the Indian witnesses — which are 27 in number — are expected to be discussed.

A witness from Thatta, Abdul Samad, also appeared to record his statement today, linking one of the suspects, Shahid Jamil Riaz, to Ali Nawaz Shah village in Thatta.

The ATC also issued non-bailable warrants for a witness Nazr-u-Sharif — who currently resides in the United States — for failing to appear in court.

The court questioned the Federal Investigation Agency for information about two witnesses who have passed away.

The hearing of the case was adjourned until December 6.

Last year in January, Islamabad had asked the Indian government to send the 24 witnesses to Pakistan to testify against the seven suspects — Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the alleged mastermind of the attacks, Abdul Wajid, Mazhar Iqbal, Hammad Amin Sadiq, Shahid Jameel Riaz, Jamil Ahmed and Younus Anjum — that are being tried by the ATC in Islamabad.

Explore: Mumbai's long shadow: What led to Hafiz Saeed's arrest

In September last year, India finally agreed to share material evidence regarding the Mumbai attacks.

The case is being tried in the ATC since 2009.

At the time of the attacks, Lakhvi was believed to be the operational head of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) that has been accused by India of carrying out the attacks in India's financial capital.

Lakhvi along with Zarar Shah was allegedly the key planner of the attack that killed 166 people.

Though a prime suspect in the case, the Lahore High Court had released Lakhvi in 2015 after he furnished Rs2 million in surety bonds. The Indian government lodged a strong protest over his release; however, the Pakistani authorities demanded that India provide incriminating evidence against him so he can be held in jail and tried effectively.

Opinion

Editorial

Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.
Terrorist havens
07 Aug, 2026

Terrorist havens

DESPITE the use of both carrots and sticks by the international community, the Afghan Taliban refuse to cut their...
Mineral wealth
Updated 07 Aug, 2026

Mineral wealth

Any future agreements involving critical minerals must be subjected to rigorous legal, financial and technical scrutiny.
Growth denied
07 Aug, 2026

Growth denied

THE Sindh government’s agreement with the World Bank to combine health, nutrition, sanitation, social protection...