ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday directed the police and top officials of the district administration of Islamabad to submit affidavits regarding the disappearance of an IT engineer.

IHC’s Justice Athar Minallah also directed the concerned station house officer, superintendent of police, senior superintendent of police, inspector general, deputy commissioner and chief commissioner Islamabad to explain how Sajid Mehmood, a resident of F-10 Islamabad, went missing and why they had failed in performing their lawful duty of tracing and recovering the missing man.

The court passed these directions after standing counsel of the state, Khawaja Imtiaz said law enforcement and intelligence agencies cannot trace the missing man.

Sajid Mehmood was picked up in March 2016; intelligence agencies, police say they don’t have custody of him nor do they know where he is

Mr Imtiaz said intelligence agencies including the Inter Services Intelligence and Military Intelligence had denied custody of Mehmood and had said they did not know where he was either.

He said the police had also checked all central jails and other locations but could not find a clue which could have led to Mehmood.

Mr Imtiaz said the matter has also been referred to The Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearance which is trying to find Mehmood.

The IT engineer was picked up in March 2016 by armed men from his house in F-10.

His wife, Mahera Sajid filed a case in the courts for the recovery of her husband.

On March 15 last year, she submitted an application with the Shalimar police for the registration of a criminal case for the abduction of her husband but the police registered the FIR on July 14.

In a report on the disappearance of Mehmood submitted to the IHC in Dec 2016, the inspector general of the capital police said the SHO an investigation officer of the Shalimar police “failed to timely register the FIR” of the incident.

Justice Minallah on Friday ordered the SHO and SP Shalimar police to compile an affidavit and produce it in court on Oct 20.

Counsel for the petitioner, Umer Gilani, said the court should order the government to pay maintenance to the missing person’s wife and three daughters.

Earlier, the court also appointed advocate Babar Sattar and Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri as amicus curie in this case.

Jahangiri said that the case shows a lack of commitment by state agencies and the SHO of the concerned police station, and that the relevant SP and the IG should be penalised.

Sattar cited verdicts by courts in Pakistan, India, and Latin America where the state paid compensation to missing persons and their relatives. A research brief by former law minister Ahmer Bilal Soofi was also submitted before the court.

Published in Dawn, September 23rd, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...