‘Sharifs and court’

Published September 20, 2017

THIS refers to your editorial ‘The path ahead for Sharifs & court’ (Sept 16). The observation that “ the Supreme Court verdict against Mr Sharif was disappointing from a strictly legal perspective” is reprehensible and uncalled for. Such unwarranted comments question the competence, jurisdiction and locus standi of the country’s highest judicial forum, which gave numerous opportunities to the Sharifs to defend themselves.

Nawaz Sharif is fortunate that he got the chance to submit a review petition against the disqualification verdict of the Supreme Court. It is a different matter that his lawyers were unable to submit a single defence argument in front of the review bench. It is recalled that there was no review appeal filing in ZAB’s death case, nor was this privilege availed of by Saulat Mirza after the confirmation of his death conviction.

According to the rules, the review appeal is heard by the same bench as announces the judgement. Forming a new bench or a larger bench would be amount to reopening the case. There is no reason why Mr Sharif should have been given an exception in the case.

Arshad M. Khawaja

Karachi

(2)

APROPOS the editorial ‘The path ahead for Sharifs and court’ (Sept 16). I refer to a sentence: “….institutions, particularly the judiciary, need to demonstrate that faith in the constitutional democratic process is justified.” I am not sure what your editorial was trying to say.

Faith in any constitutional democratic process is just that, a matter of faith. And what such faith requires of all players in the game is that the process be respected and that no player should feel he has the right to manage or manipulate the process because he thinks he knows better.

But whose faith, exactly, in the constitutional democratic process, as you call it, was the editorial questioning? Those who believe that governments should be both elected and removed by the electorate? Or those who believe that they are sometimes (often!) obliged to take matters into their own hands for the good of the people, who really aren’t clever or educated enough to choose and remove their own leaders, and therefore, must act as they know better how Pakistan should be governed?

Ali Khan

Islamabad

Published in Dawn, September 20th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
Updated 19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

The govt ought to take a direct approach comprising convincing communication with the students and Kyrgyz authorities.
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...