US demands big Nafta changes

Published August 17, 2017

WASHINGTON: The United States won’t settle for cosmetic changes to the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta), the top US trade negotiator said, as negotiations to rework terms of the pact began.

President Donald Trump has called the 23-year-old trade pact the “worst” in history and vowed to fix it or withdraw from it.

On the first of five days of talks, US Trade Rep. Robert Lighthizer said Wednesday that Trump “is not interested in a mere tweaking of a few provisions and an updating of a few chapters. We believe Nafta has fundamentally failed many, many Americans and needs major improvement.” Nafta did away with most barriers, including tariffs, on trade between the US, Canada and Mexico.

The Trump administration and other Nafta critics say the agreement encouraged manufacturers to move south of the border to take advantage of lower-wage Mexican labor. Lighthizer said that at least 700,000 Americans have lost their jobs because of the way Nafta rerouted commerce.

The US trade representative said he wanted to change the pact to require that duty-free Nafta products contain more content made within the trade bloc and specifically in the United States. But Stephen Orava, partner and head of the trade law practice at King & Spalding, said that changing Nafta’s “rules of origin” to promote Made-in-the-USA products would prove “complicated” and risk disrupting the intricate supply chains that manufacturers have built across Nafta borders.

Lighthizer’s comments suggest the negotiations could prove contentious. The Canadian and Mexican negotiators defended Nafta as an economic success story, though they say it needs to be updated to reflect economic and technological changes.

Nafta critic Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, said Lighthizer’s tough talk raises the possibility that the United States will pull out of Nafta if it can’t get the deal it wants. “He doesn’t bluff,” she said. “It was a message to Mexico and Canada: ‘We hope we can reach a deal, but we aren’t playing.’”

Published in Dawn, August 17th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...