Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience


India, Pakistan and the musk deer


Your Name:

Recipient Email:

“Tera saai’n tujh me, jyu pahupan me baas Kasturi ka mirag jyu, phiri-phiri dhoondhai ghaas”

THE fragrance of the flower flows from within the flower, so it is with people. Why then, so much like the baffled musk deer, do people search for their own fragrance in the distant grass? The 15th-century guru Kabir wrote the lines some 300 years before Hegel would grapple with a similar thought. And how well the lines sit with the trauma of an identity crisis South Asia’s communists have suffered from almost the very beginning.

One such moment came in February 1951 when four leading Indian partisans secretly boarded a ship from Calcutta to the USSR. They had a rendezvous with Stalin and they hoped to gain from his revolutionary experience and perhaps could do with some guidance too. They were keen to avert a looming split within their ranks, and they also needed Stalin’s opinion about the widely fabled but internally divided Telangana movement they had been running valiantly but with mixed results. Stalin surveyed the maps of Telangana. Then very politely he advised them to stop the unwinnable insurrection. The Indians should seek the parliamentary route to power instead. Nehru although a slippery eel was no stool pigeon of colonialism, Stalin told the visitors. Moreover, the popular Indian leader was too deeply admired by the masses to be pushed over by mere fervour minus strategy or resources.

A less polite version of the meeting came in 1979 when Stalin’s interpreter and diplomat Nikolai Adyrkhayev’s memoirs were released. Soon after meeting the leaders of the Communist Party of India, with whom he was polite without being overly respectful of their revolutionary ideas, Stalin scolded a delegation of the Japanese Communist Party. “In India they have wrecked the party and there is something similar with you.” Just around then another Indian partisan “had the privilege” to carry the party’s ‘China path’ document to China.

In an irony, not unusual for South Asia’s communists, while Stalin took a dim view of his Indian partners’ ability to stage a successful revolution, the capitalist order led by the Americans was quaking in its boots over precisely that fear.

What if Afghanistan, Pakistan and India were to overthrow their avowedly anti-communist governments?

“The most serious effects of the loss of the Indian subcontinent to communist control would be psychological and political,” noted the CIA in a secret analysis in1952. The bizarre thing about the analysis, contained in the agency’s recently declassified files, was that it coincided with the Indian comrades’ unhappy and unpublicised Moscow meeting with Stalin.

“Communist victory in South Asia, if not preceded by the loss of much of Southeast Asia, would be speedily followed by it and the remaining non-communist countries of Asia would be under strong pressure from their communist neighbours.” The CIA saw prospects for an Indian upheaval that had eluded Stalin. The Americans seemed to have a better idea of where the source of the musk deer’s fragrance was than the deer itself knew.

What if Afghanistan, Pakistan and India were to overthrow their avowedly anti-communist governments? The question posed by the CIA analyst echoed a real and palpable fear in the West. Little did Messrs Ajoy Ghosh, Basavapunnaiah, Dange and Rajeshwar Rao, know this when, dressed as ordinary workers, they embarked on a journey that would further sap their self-confidence.

Communist victories in India and Pakistan, the CIA noted, would deprive the US of “the support, present and potential, of a group of nations whose ties and sympathies are primarily with the West, and the usefulness of the UN to the US”. A communist victory in the subcontinent would also undermine the will to resist “communist aggression” in non-communist Asia, Africa, and Western Europe. Suppose the agency’s analysis became public around that time, would it not have restored the partisans’ shaken self-belief?

The CIA informed the American leadership that a communist takeover in India and Pakistan would not bring economic benefits to the Soviet bloc but it would add greatly to the economic potential of the “communist sphere”.

The subcontinent, it was observed, not without a hint of nervousness, had the largest industrial plant in Asia outside of Japan, a huge labour supply including a considerable number of skilled and semi-skilled workers and the natural resources to support extensive industrial expansion.

The low per capita productivity of the region and its dependence upon imports obtained from the West would pose serious but not insuperable problems for the communists. “China and North Korea have shown a capacity to mobilise meagre resources quickly and effectively.”

The agency’s perspective was routinely peppered with its McCarthy moments. By “ruthless methods … the communists could … within five to 10 years develop a specialised industry capable of supplying sufficient material to a large modern army”. The CIA was not discussing two mutually hostile armies they were to become, or rather made to become. Imagine that.

Had India and Pakistan pulled it off, “it would add five nations, two of them large and potentially powerful, and nearly a fifth of the world’s population to the Soviet bloc, and would precipitate the rapid transfer of much of Southeast Asia to communist control supposing this had not already occurred”.

The phenomenon of having the world’s most powerful capitalist country worried sick eluded India’s partisans, however. But the CIA was certain that the loss of South Asia would be “all the more grievous to the West inasmuch as it would involve countries whose present regimes are actively anti-communist”.

Moreover, a revolution in South Asia coming on the heels of the communist victory in China would create the impression throughout non-communist Asia, Africa and Western Europe “that the advance of communism was inexorable”.

What do we make of it then? Did the CIA work itself into a self-induced trance about India and Pakistan’s revolutionary capacity, or had it overestimated the musk deer’s olfactory prowess to divine the source of its own fragrance?

The writer is Dawn’s correspondent in Delhi.

Published in Dawn February 14th, 2017

The views expressed by this writer and commenters below do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.

Comments (20) Closed

sri1 Feb 14, 2017 05:42am

A muddled and confused Indian leadership with numerous internal divisions has always kept India down since the forties. This is perhaps the first time that India has a clear eyed, nationalist leadership although we still have internal discord.

PrakashG Feb 14, 2017 08:29am

What is the relevance of this article?

SIMPLA Feb 14, 2017 09:38am

We have seen how took land from the ownership of the forward castes in Kerala and handed over the same in a platter to the middle castes such as ezhavas thus depriving the owners as well as the working class of land ownership. Entire younger generations of forward castes such as Brahmins and nairs took to educating themselves and migrated to other parts of the country and the world to succeed. Now, the position is that once this generation goes, communists will not find foothold even in Kerala or west Bengal. They are leeches.

sajed syed Feb 14, 2017 09:41am

Useless article with heavy words used to show one's knowledge of the language than conveying in layman's simple language what is he trying to say.

sajed syed Feb 14, 2017 09:41am

@PrakashG , absolutely Nothing.

brr Feb 14, 2017 09:51am

All this musk stuff is rather too esoteric to make much sense of a mundane phenomenon - people believing their own mumbo jumbo ideology and unable to see the reality or the situation, thereby reading too much into ordinary political developments.

anil sahu Feb 14, 2017 09:52am

such a baseless article..

Rajesh Khanna Feb 14, 2017 10:12am

useless article I say....

CONFUCIUS Feb 14, 2017 01:13pm

American foreign policy was, at least till the turn of the century, dominated by this concern, popularly articulated as the Domino Theory. A once active communist movement in many parts of the subcontinent is today in total disarray, with the failure of the Soviet project, and to a lesser extent, the Chinese going the capitalist way. But then again, perhaps it is a cycle. Communism's appeal retains its allure, and the movement its potency, even as the state as idealized has never ever materialized. A strong leader however could still turn the tide

Shahryar Shirazi Feb 14, 2017 01:44pm

@anil sahu Its a hypothetical ....

Jan jawad Feb 14, 2017 02:38pm

Got nothing. just some new complex words

BROTHER THERESA Feb 14, 2017 06:25pm

India is on its right course, why should we even consider a change because we can't be allies with Pakistan !? Why in the world would we do that?

Ahmed Feb 14, 2017 08:19pm

@PrakashG Everytime I have same question.

Indian Feb 14, 2017 08:37pm

India has the best government so far.

Manoj Mumbai Feb 14, 2017 10:39pm

@sajed syed I fully agree with your observations !

SachiN Feb 15, 2017 12:59am

Did not understand. However please try to bring India and Pakistan closer using your position.

rashid nasim Feb 15, 2017 02:08am

Sorry; I have no ides, what is the message in this article

Abbas khan Feb 15, 2017 02:39am

@Indian Dream on buddy. Remember No govt in the world is good. Oh sorry except India (LOL)!

BNJ Feb 16, 2017 10:34am

I tried very hard but could not understand this article !

n v s praneeth Feb 16, 2017 06:15pm

communism is a disease and must be eradicated from ones land.. free market and free market libertarianism shuld thrive and then only one can prosper.. our neighbouring state bengal had communist rule for 3 decades and it looked pathetic