LAHORE, Jan 1: Justice Karamat Nazir Bhandari of the Lahore High Court allowed a petitioner-lawyer to amend his petition against ban on the Lashkar-i-Taiba and the Jaish-i-Muhammad to confine it to the detention of their chiefs.

Advocate M.D. Tahir emphasized the importance of Jihad in Islam in his opening arguments against the ban. The judge observed that he had misjoined a number of matters and sought a variety of reliefs which could only be considered separately. While demanding withdrawal of the ban imposed on two Pakistani organizations, he had sought disbandment of India’s RSS and Shiv Sena and trial of their leaders.

The lawyer asked for permission to amend his petition to restrict it to the production and release of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and Maulana Masood Azhar.

JUDGES APPOINTMENTS: A division bench of the Lahore High Court allowed a petitioner-lawyer on Tuesday to amend his writ petition against the recent Supreme Court appointments to implead all four high court judges appointed and also to allege that they were made without consulting the outgoing chief justice.

Advocate A.K. Dogar had named only two of the SC judges-designate — Justices Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar — as respondents and left out Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday of the Lahore High Court and Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan of the Peshawar High Court.

While Justice Ramday’s name cropped up from the petitioner’s plea that LHC Chief Justice Falak Sher and Senior Puisne Judge Mian Nazir Akhtar should have been elevated first, CJ Sardar Raza’s appointment also became relevant in the context of his argument on Tuesday that a single combined seniority list of all high court judges of the four provinces be drawn up for the purpose of elevations to the Supreme Court. All four appointments have been made through the impugned notification.

Mr Dogar also argued on Tuesday that Chief Justice Irshad Hasan Khan had not probably been consulted in the impugned appointments otherwise he would have opposed them. He cited Justice Irshad’s order as a member of the SC’s Quetta Bench in Asad Ali case whereby he had suspended the notification of CJ Sajjad Ali Shah’s appointment for not being the seniormost judge of the apex court.

The division bench assigned the petition in view of its importance observed that he had not raised the plea in his petition. Mr Dogar sought permission to amend the petition, which was granted. The bench consists of Justice Chaudhry Ijaz Ahmad and Syed Jamshed Ali. The petition has been filed on behalf of the Pakistan Lawyers’ Forum.

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...