LAHORE, Jan 1: Justice Karamat Nazir Bhandari of the Lahore High Court allowed a petitioner-lawyer to amend his petition against ban on the Lashkar-i-Taiba and the Jaish-i-Muhammad to confine it to the detention of their chiefs.

Advocate M.D. Tahir emphasized the importance of Jihad in Islam in his opening arguments against the ban. The judge observed that he had misjoined a number of matters and sought a variety of reliefs which could only be considered separately. While demanding withdrawal of the ban imposed on two Pakistani organizations, he had sought disbandment of India’s RSS and Shiv Sena and trial of their leaders.

The lawyer asked for permission to amend his petition to restrict it to the production and release of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and Maulana Masood Azhar.

JUDGES APPOINTMENTS: A division bench of the Lahore High Court allowed a petitioner-lawyer on Tuesday to amend his writ petition against the recent Supreme Court appointments to implead all four high court judges appointed and also to allege that they were made without consulting the outgoing chief justice.

Advocate A.K. Dogar had named only two of the SC judges-designate — Justices Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi and Faqir Muhammad Khokhar — as respondents and left out Justice Khalilur Rehman Ramday of the Lahore High Court and Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan of the Peshawar High Court.

While Justice Ramday’s name cropped up from the petitioner’s plea that LHC Chief Justice Falak Sher and Senior Puisne Judge Mian Nazir Akhtar should have been elevated first, CJ Sardar Raza’s appointment also became relevant in the context of his argument on Tuesday that a single combined seniority list of all high court judges of the four provinces be drawn up for the purpose of elevations to the Supreme Court. All four appointments have been made through the impugned notification.

Mr Dogar also argued on Tuesday that Chief Justice Irshad Hasan Khan had not probably been consulted in the impugned appointments otherwise he would have opposed them. He cited Justice Irshad’s order as a member of the SC’s Quetta Bench in Asad Ali case whereby he had suspended the notification of CJ Sajjad Ali Shah’s appointment for not being the seniormost judge of the apex court.

The division bench assigned the petition in view of its importance observed that he had not raised the plea in his petition. Mr Dogar sought permission to amend the petition, which was granted. The bench consists of Justice Chaudhry Ijaz Ahmad and Syed Jamshed Ali. The petition has been filed on behalf of the Pakistan Lawyers’ Forum.

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...