TAXILA: Teacher’s unions have protested the Punjab School Education Department’s (SED) decision to transfer dozens of headmasters and principals for showing “low” results.

Talking at a press conference on Monday, Muthahida Teachers’ Union President Hassanabdal Chapter Malik Maqsood said that the education department has transferred dozens of headmasters and principals of various high schools for securing a less then 75pc result in secondary school examinations.

He said a notification issued in this regard says that “the transfers were made on grounds of poor performance during three academic sessions, determined by calculating the grade point average based on the enrolment in class IX, subsequent appearance in the Matriculation examinations, passing out percentage, failure and quality of education in terms of grades achieved by the students”.

Mr Maqsood said that the SED had transferred these headmasters and principals to far-flung areas and declared the decision “anti-teacher”.

He added that the union will not tolerate such an action as it was taken without giving consideration to the situation under which they were working.

SED had issued targets without considering the quality of education in the province, he added.

Mr Maqsood said that in the present socio-economic conditions, achieving a 74 to 50pc result is “exemplary” as most of the students in government schools are from far-flung areas.

He said the government has continuously blamed teachers for its own shortcomings, and reminded those present that earlier in the year, the SED had sought action against the heads of public schools which had not done well in the matriculation exams under the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability (PEEDA) Act, 2006.

According to a letter issued to EDOs on August 17, the SED public instructions director had said that the education department wanted the heads of institutions which had performed well to be awarded appreciation letters while those with poor performance should be dealt with under the PEEDA Act 2006.

Published in Dawn, October 25th, 2016

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...