Syria truce in tatters

Published September 26, 2016

THE truce that Washington D.C. and Moscow hammered out for Syria earlier this month is all but dead, and with it any hope for an end to hostilities in that forsaken land. As these lines were being written, the Syrian army was leading a brutal assault on the rebel-held parts of Aleppo. The humanitarian situation in what was once Syria’s commercial capital is dire, with reportedly 250,000 civilians besieged. The truce had slim chances of success, but offered a glimmer of hope for the Syrian people. However, it appears Syria’s future will be decided on the battlefield, and not the negotiating table, no matter what the cost in blood and treasure, as both the government and opposition refuse to relent. While there were ceasefire violations on both sides, the US bombing on Sept 17 — said to have been carried out ‘mistakenly’ — in which over 60 Syrian troops perished, helped seal the fate of the doomed truce, as Bashar al-Assad’s government soon thereafter called off the ceasefire.

Unfortunately, if the primary Syrian actors — the government in Damascus and the opposition — are not interested in a peaceful solution, no well-intentioned external effort can succeed. And after over five years of war, it is clear that both sides would rather stick to their guns than cede any space for a compromise solution. Mr Assad is convinced he can retake territory lost to the rebels and militants by force, regardless of the collateral damage, while the opposition’s rigidity is also problematic; more worryingly, the rebels have consorted with militant groups that have a clearly sectarian and extremist agenda. And, both sides have committed appalling atrocities in the conflict. So, when the Syrian belligerents themselves are uninterested in peace, external players will have limited impact on the conflict. Caught in between this geopolitical game and domestic strife are Syria’s hapless people. Sadly, there will be no end to their miseries until the leaders of Syria’s opposing factions decide to forsake bloodshed in favour of a negotiated settlement.

Published in Dawn, September 26th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.