THE reunion of Matt Damon and Paul Greenglass in Jason Bourne, an alliance of star and director that has previously produced two successful sequels to The Bourne Identity, is a naked bid to resuscitate a franchise whose increasing desperation was already apparent in The Bourne Legacy.

That 2012 spinoff of the Robert Ludlum-inspired spy series, which featured neither Damon nor Greenglass, came and went without much notice.

Unfortunately, the new film — despite an enjoyably buzzy, of-the-moment plot that is heavily fuelled by paranoia over social-media-data mining and government surveillance — suffers from the same problems that surfaced in Greenglass’ earlier outings with Damon, The Bourne Supremacy and The Bourne Ultimatum: a reliance on formulaic plotting and a frenetic-to-the-point-of-vertigo visual style.

Just how frenetic is it? At times, Jason Bourne looks like it was shot by the monkey cam from Late Night With David Letterman. Its shaky, handheld cinematography and seemingly amphetamine-powered editing — characterised by so many blurry zooms, pans and quick cuts that it makes a GoPro skateboarding video look like Citizen Kane — drive home the message that we are potentially being watched and listened to every second of the day, no matter where or who we are. That topical subtext is the best thing about Jason Bourne, but the unattractive appearance of the film undercuts, rather than serves, the theme.

As in Damon’s earlier appearances as Jason Bourne, an amnesiac operative trying to simultaneously piece together and leave behind his past as a remorseless, CIA-trained killing machine, the new film features its hero living off the grid. Opening near the border between Greece and Albania, where Bourne appears to be eking out a living fighting shirtless hulks in bare-knuckle, no-rules brawls, the movie quickly settles into the comfortable groove of every Bourne movie so far. That’s Bourne on the run — from Greece to London to Berlin to Las Vegas, with stops in between — from corrupt CIA officials and thugs, all of whom want to kill him before he can expose whatever secret assassination and/or espionage program they are currently about to be embarrassed by. (“Treadstone,” “Blackbriar” and “Iron Hand” are some of the code names you will hear. It hardly matters what they mean.)

The film opens with Bourne’s old co-worker and flame Nicky (Julia Stiles) hacking into a CIA database in order to make public the agency’s skeletons on a WikiLeaks-style website run by a Julian Assange stand-in (Vinzenz Kiefer). But after Nicky’s attempt to enlist her pal in whistleblowing goes violently south, Bourne decides to hunt down the spooks that got her, whether they’re pen-pushers, like the evil CIA director (Tommy Lee Jones), or hit men, like the sociopath known only as the Asset (Vincent Cassel). A revelation about Bourne’s back story with that killer adds a layer of personal vendetta to the narrative, but it’s less interesting than the film’s ripped-from-the headlines themes.

Those come courtesy of a company — part Facebook, part Google — that has been in cahoots with the CIA to develop a social-media platform called Deep Dream that will vacuum all your metadata (and actual data), enabling the feds to know everything about everyone. When the company’s Zuckerbergian founder (Riz Ahmed) has second thoughts about his deal with the devil, he becomes a target of the agency’s wrath as well.

All this plays out at a breakneck pace that is paradoxically unengaging, despite the non-stop action. As Greenglass’s Bourne films have grown ever more hyperactive, you may find yourself longing for the first, Doug Liman-directed movie, which actually set aside moments for quiet contemplation and conversation before returning to scenes of Bourne running, fighting and shooting people.

No more. There is barely time to show a character arriving in some new airport, let alone enjoying an in-flight meal. The plot of Jason Bourne jumps from city to city, and from car chase to shootout, with the pitiless efficiency of the Asset, who leaves in his wake an almost laughably large pile of bodies and upside-down vehicles.

Alicia Vikander, as an ambiguously ambitious CIA agent, brings a nice level of ruthlessness to the proceedings, but her character, like so many others, is underdeveloped. Jason Bourne belongs to Damon and Greenglass, whose admirable — and entirely appropriate — goal of playing it for kicks comes across, this time around, as an oddly joyless chore.

—By arrangement with The Washington Post

Published in Dawn, July 29th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...
Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.