US backs action against terrorist groups

Published November 6, 2015
'Pakistan should speak for itself and for why it made this decision and how it’s going to execute this decision.'—AFP/File
'Pakistan should speak for itself and for why it made this decision and how it’s going to execute this decision.'—AFP/File

WASHINGTON: Taking action against terrorist groups is fundamental to addressing the scourge of terrorism, says the US State Department while commenting on Pakistan’s decision to ban media coverage of extremist outfits.

On Nov 2, Pakistan’s electronic media watchdog Pemra banned media coverage of three key extremist groups, Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jamaatud Dawa and Falah-i-Insanyat.

Pemra also attached with the order a list of 60 proscribed groups and 12 others on its watch list, indicating that the ban also applied to them.

At the State Department’s briefing on Wednesday afternoon, an Indian journalist called the ban a violation of freedom of expression and asked spokesman John Kirby to condemn it.

Also read: Who asked Pemra to ban JuD, others?

“We’re certainly aware of those reports, and I would refer you to the government of Pakistan for information on its decision,” said the US official. “We obviously continue to urge steps to constrain militant groups operating in the region, including these two in particular – JUD and LeT.”

Mr Kirby reminded the journalist that LeT was a designated foreign terrorist organisation. “We absolutely believe that taking actions against them are fundamental to addressing the scourge of terrorism. There’s no question where we are on that,” he said.

US President Barack Obama also discussed the issue with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif during a meeting at the White House on Oct 22.

Mr Kirby’s response to questions on the issue at the briefing made it obvious that the US backed Pakistan’s actions against banned terrorist organisations.

The back and forth questions and answers generated an almost 1400-word transcript but it failed persuade the US official to condemn the Pakistani action.

“On the actual ban itself … we regularly discuss with all our partners the importance of balancing this fight against terrorism, and there’s a need there, with the imperative to preserve civil liberties, including freedom of expression and freedom of the press,” he said.

When another journalist asked him why was he reluctant to call the Pakistani action a “bad thing”, Mr Kirby said: “Pakistan should speak for itself and for why it made this decision and how it’s going to execute this decision.”

Published in Dawn, November 6th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Canal consensus
29 Apr, 2025

Canal consensus

IT is official. Plans to build new canals on the Indus have been shelved till such time that all provinces can find...
Incursions thwarted
29 Apr, 2025

Incursions thwarted

THE military’s media wing has released details of infiltration attempts by terrorists based in Afghanistan, saying...
Pension reforms
29 Apr, 2025

Pension reforms

The federal government has finally notified another pension reform that requires retired public servants rehired by...
At heat’s mercy
Updated 28 Apr, 2025

At heat’s mercy

The current heatwave is a dire warning of what lies ahead if Pakistan fails to confront the realities of climate change.
Culture war
28 Apr, 2025

Culture war

THE heightened tensions between India and Pakistan have sealed the fate of Abir Gulaal. Slated for a May release and...
Haj mismanagement
28 Apr, 2025

Haj mismanagement

THE relevant authorities in Pakistan are often blamed for negligence and poor management when it comes to Haj...