US Congress curbs NSA surveillance; Obama signs into law

Published June 3, 2015
Sen. Mike Lee (L) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (R) talk to reporters after the final passage of the USA FREEDOM Act at the US Capitol June 2, 2015 in Washington, DC. Co-sponsored by Lee and Leahy, the legislation passed the Senate 67-32, matches the House version of the bill and will go to President Barack Obama for his signature. —AFP
Sen. Mike Lee (L) and Sen. Patrick Leahy (R) talk to reporters after the final passage of the USA FREEDOM Act at the US Capitol June 2, 2015 in Washington, DC. Co-sponsored by Lee and Leahy, the legislation passed the Senate 67-32, matches the House version of the bill and will go to President Barack Obama for his signature. —AFP
Snowden called efforts to end mass surveillance “not enough” but “an important step”.—Reuters/File
Snowden called efforts to end mass surveillance “not enough” but “an important step”.—Reuters/File

WASHINGTON: President Barack Obama on Tuesday signed into law landmark legislation ending the government's bulk telephone data dragnet, significantly reversing American policy by reining in the most controversial surveillance program since 9/11.

The bill was given final passage earlier Tuesday by the US Senate, after being approved by the House several days earlier.

The measure reauthorises key national security programs that had lapsed early this week.

"Glad the Senate finally passed the USA Freedom Act. It protects civil liberties and our national security," President Barack Obama said on Twitter shortly before he signed it.

In a separate statement earlier, Obama chided lawmakers for the "needless delay and inexcusable lapse in important national security authorities," in the days leading up to the bill's eventual passage.

"My administration will work expeditiously to ensure our national security professionals again have the full set of vital tools they need to continue protecting the country," the president said.

The bill halts the National Security Agency's ability to scoop up and store metadata — telephone numbers, dates and times of calls — from millions of Americans who have no connection to terrorism.

Also read: US House passes bill ending NSA bulk data collection

It shifts responsibility for storing the data to telephone companies, allowing authorities to access the information only with a warrant from a secret counterterror court that identifies a specific person or group of people suspected of terror ties.

"It's a historic moment," Senator Patrick Leahy, the senior Democratic sponsor of the bill, said after the 67-32 vote, describing the bill as "the first major overhaul of government surveillance laws in decades".

The vote follows days of sharp debate on the floor, with many Republicans split over their support for strong counter-terror measures and the need for personal privacy protections in the wake of former NSA contractor Edward Snowden's bombshell revelations about the bulk data dragnet in 2013.

Important but 'not enough'

The fugitive Snowden, alternatively seen as a villain by intelligence backers and a hero by supporters of stronger civil liberties, hailed the congressional action as "historic".

Speaking by live video link from Russia at an Amnesty International event in London shortly before the bill was passed, Snowden called efforts to end mass surveillance "not enough" but "an important step".

The Republican divisions, as well as delay tactics by Senator Rand Paul, a 2016 presidential candidate, forced an expiration of the bulk data collection program and two other sections of the USA Patriot Act, roving wiretap and lone-wolf tracking authorities, all of which expired at midnight Sunday.

The legislation that passed Tuesday would reauthorise the latter two provisions.

The strong vote marked a stunning rebuke to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who sought in vain to amend the bill. One of the changes would have extended the transition period from six months to a year from NSA storage to telecoms storage of the data.

Another would have stripped out a provision that declassifies rulings by the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court, a move critics have argued would erode important transparency that was built into the Freedom Act.

The changes were rejected, with at least 11 Republicans opposing McConnell to vote against the amendments. McConnell decried the reform bill as "a step backward".

"This is going to diminish our ability to respond to the myriad threats we have today," he said in a provocative floor speech in which he accused the Obama administration of withdrawing from leadership in the battle against extremism.

"It is also a resounding victory for those who continually plot against our homeland," McConnell said.

The vote occurred against a backdrop of Republican infighting and tension about the bill.

House leaders had warned that any change to the bill could delay its final passage or even kill it, which would have meant several national security authorisations expiring for good. Many major Internet firms declared victory with the congressional approval.

"The USA Freedom Act realises hard-fought and much-needed wins for Internet users everywhere, including prohibiting the bulk collection of user data," Yahoo! said in a statement.

But Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio, a Florida senator who voted against the act, slammed it as result of "weak presidential leadership".

"The failure to renew the expiring components of the PATRIOT Act was a mistake. The 'USA Freedom Act' weakens US national security by outlawing the very programs our intelligence community and the FBI have used to protect us time and time again," Rubio said.

"Unfortunately, weak presidential leadership combined with a politically motivated misinformation campaign have now left the American people less safe than we've been at any point since the 9/11 attacks," he added.

Opinion

The Dar story continues

The Dar story continues

One wonders what the rationale was for the foreign minister — a highly demanding, full-time job — being assigned various other political responsibilities.

Editorial

Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.
All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...