DCOs want LEAs to seek detention with evidence

Published May 5, 2015
“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted. — AFP/file
“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted. — AFP/file

LAHORE: Embarrassed over the release of nearly half of the detained alleged hardcore elements across the province for lack of evidence, almost all DCOs have reportedly asked police and other law-enforcement agencies to seek detention orders of only those against whom they have solid material for their involvement in any subversive activity.

“It was the heat of the moment when we detained the alleged hardcore elements. But the objectivity element in their detention was missing which was exposed when they approached courts and appellant authorities for their freedom,” a DCO admitted on Sunday.

According to information gathered by Dawn from various districts, the government had given the task of detaining all hardcore elements in the light of the National Action Plan (NAP) made in the aftermath of the attack on Peshawar’s Army Public School.

As a result, lists of the alleged hardcore persons were provided by district intelligence coordination committees comprising representatives of police and law-enforcement agencies. The stereotyped reports regarding the so-called evidence were submitted by these representatives.

“This process was not objective and was adopted in view of the pressure by the high-ups. The element of objectivity was missing that was why the courts and the appellate authorities had to order release of the detainees,” a DCO said.

Sources claimed that all the detainees were hardcore elements. They were under watch and could be detained. But the track record of those released accused was missing. For example, there was no evidence of when and where someone delivered hate speech or how one acted as a facilitator or harboured anyone and how one was a part of the fund providing channels.

“Courts seek evidence and I have asked the authorities concerned that they would have to keep it in mind,” a DCO said.

Published in Dawn, May 5th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Energy inflation
Updated 23 May, 2024

Energy inflation

The widening gap between the haves and have-nots is already tearing apart Pakistan’s social fabric.
Culture of violence
23 May, 2024

Culture of violence

WHILE political differences are part of the democratic process, there can be no justification for such disagreements...
Flooding threats
23 May, 2024

Flooding threats

WITH temperatures in GB and KP forecasted to be four to six degrees higher than normal this week, the threat of...
Bulldozed bill
Updated 22 May, 2024

Bulldozed bill

Where once the party was championing the people and their voices, it is now devising new means to silence them.
Out of the abyss
22 May, 2024

Out of the abyss

ENFORCED disappearances remain a persistent blight on fundamental human rights in the country. Recent exchanges...
Holding Israel accountable
22 May, 2024

Holding Israel accountable

ALTHOUGH the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor wants arrest warrants to be issued for Israel’s prime...