External borrowers wary of dollar’s rise

Published April 27, 2015
A picture taken on April 17 shows foreign currency mortgage holders who went on hunger strike, talking in an apartment in Moscow. Russians who took out mortgages denominated in foreign currencies, lured by lower interest rates, went on hunger strike in a last-ditch attempt to get lenders and the government to offer them an acceptable solution.—AFP
A picture taken on April 17 shows foreign currency mortgage holders who went on hunger strike, talking in an apartment in Moscow. Russians who took out mortgages denominated in foreign currencies, lured by lower interest rates, went on hunger strike in a last-ditch attempt to get lenders and the government to offer them an acceptable solution.—AFP

CHINA offered investors a cautionary tale this week of what can happen when a company borrows heavily in dollars.

On Monday, Kaisa Group became the first Chinese property developer to default on dollar-denominated bonds as a housing market slowdown left it struggling to service its heavy debt burden.

Investors fear such defaults could soon become commonplace as the dollar’s growing strength threatens to unravel a glut of global borrowing now estimated to exceed $9tn.

Since the crisis, companies and governments outside the US have doubled their dollar-based debt, taking advantage of near zero rates and the dollar’s exchange rate relative to local currency.

While emerging markets account for the lion’s share of borrowing, they are not alone. Global dollar credit to non-bank borrowers in the eurozone has risen from $1.3tn in late 2008 to $1.6tn at the end of September 2014, says the Switzerland-based Bank of International Settlements, while the UK’s share has grown from $800bn to $1.05tn.

There is a reason economic data from the US are being scrutinised by finance ministers and corporate treasurers right now. A stronger dollar means borrowers outside the US require more of their own currency to service their dollar debt. Once the US central bank raises interest rates, refinancing that debt will become more expensive.

The repercussions could be defaults, volatility and waning confidence.

Concern has risen as the dollar has gained momentum. The dollar index is up more than 13pc over the past six months and last week finance ministers of G20 countries urged the US to ‘minimise negative spillovers’ when the Federal Reserve finally raises rates.

For some countries a stronger dollar provides trade benefits, but those with heavy dollar-denominated debt are experiencing ‘tensions between financial stability and competitiveness’, said the IMF’s outlook report last week.

Yet some policy makers and corporations remain oblivious, says Stephen Jen, head of currency hedge fund SLJ Macro. “It’s not that they’re ignoring the elephant in the room,” he says. “They don’t see the elephant.”

Critics worry that emerging market corporate bonds have become overinflated, with eager borrowers and lenders encouraged by a commodities super cycle, desire for yield and flood of cheap money due to central bank policies.

Emerging market hard currency corporate bonds, an asset class that hardly existed a decade ago, amount to an estimated $2tn, bigger than the $1.6bn market in US high-yield corporate bonds.

Muddying the waters is the fact that since the financial crisis, lending in dollars has moved from banks to capital markets. According to the BIS, the share of dollar lending via bank loans has fallen from two-thirds in the late 1990s to about 50pc last year.

This makes it more difficult to untangle who is at risk due to dollar strength, and more likely to spread the effects.

Steve Barrow, G10 currency strategist at Standard Bank, says IMF and BIS warnings were designed ‘to scare the living daylights out of people deliberately’ and to ensure they hedge their dollar exposures.

The scale of global dollar credit will rise, he acknowledges. “It is a danger, but if someone keeps warning you need to do something, they will respond. So when US rates go higher, the reaction will not be that bad.”

Additional reporting by Jonathan Wheatley

Published in Dawn, Economic & Business, April 27th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...
Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...