WASHINGTON: “Four times in the modern age,” English historian John Keegan has written, “men have sat down to reorder the world — at the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 after the Thirty Years War, at the Congress of Vienna in 1815 after the Napoleonic Wars, in Paris in 1919 after World War I and in San Francisco in 1945 after World War II.” Such is the march of human history that all of these events — except for the most recent one — collapsed in disagreements that eventually led to renewed war.

The ultimate outcome of the San Francisco Conference is still not known. However, what happened there that produced the last of these grand compacts, the United Nations, has already had an enormous impact over the last six decades. Indeed, the founding of the United Nations in the age of nuclear weaponry — far more sinister circumstances than any faced by those earlier meetings — is affecting the survival or demise of humanity.

The United Nations and its labours have become the background noise of our global age. It is truly ubiquitous. It has overseen 40 years of decolonization around the planet; sent peacekeepers to places such as Cambodia, Cyprus and Sinai; helped end apartheid in South Africa via sanctions. The United Nations’ World Health Organization was critical in eradicating smallpox and is on the verge of stamping out polio; its World Food Program feeds hungry people in Africa; its UN Development Programme sends more multilateral aid dollars abroad than any nation.

People forget that before the United Nation’s founding, there was no truly functioning international organization (except for the creaky, faltering League of Nations). This meant that for many decades there was no place for nations to go in global crises.

Today, after half a century of the United Nations, few of us are unaware that this aging experiment in global society exists and has given some modicum of hope to the world — despite a dearth of financial resources and the brickbats tossed at it by American politicians. It has become the world’s geopolitical emergency room. The question is whether it can survive.

Right-wing demagogues in our land have so unremittingly denigrated the organization for so long — calling it bloated, anti-American, a body that wastes time on speechmaking, abdicates its responsibilities and remains out of touch — that leading members of the Senate now routinely dismiss its importance and argue that it unnecessarily limits our sovereignty.

Furthermore, unilateralism is back in fashion. The Bush administration, after the attacks of Sept 11, has promulgated a doctrine of preventive war that allows the United States to go into battle whenever it decides against whomever it wishes, regardless of whether there is a legitimate provocation. Recently one of Bush’s hardline appointees, Richard Perle, publicly derided the United Nations as being as ineffectual as the League of Nations. And last spring, the United States brazenly bypassed the UN Security Council to invade Iraq, relying on its pre- emptive doctrine. On Tuesday, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan said this crisis was a “fork in the road” for the organization, as decisive as the United Nations’ founding.

The sad fact is that our country would probably not pass the same UN Charter today that the US Senate ratified by an overwhelming vote, 89-2, in 1945. Even putting aside its lone- cowboy maneuvers, if Washington had wanted to reinvent the United Nations it would have been virtually impossible to persuade the 191 nations of the world again to draft a charter for the security of the Earth because of the sheer number of countries and the profusion of political differences. (Originally, the organization had 50 members.)

As we look back on the United Nations’ creation, we should realize how fortunate we were to get it in the first place. It took a grand vision, formidable planning and brilliant political leadership from two American presidents — Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman — to turn the organization into reality. Having endured the most calamitous war in history, this World War II generation extracted from the human propensity for devastation the right lesson for our time.

If we are to revive the role of the United Nations today as a peacemaker and security guarantor, the United States, as the only superpower on the planet, must again commit itself to the organization. President Bush himself has slowly come to this realization in the Iraq crisis. He is now seeking to reinvolve our fate with the United Nations because it offers political legitimacy for the American occupation of Iraq. And beyond Iraq, the United Nations bestows cover for various other US global missions, allowing Washington to save taxpayers’ dollars and the lives of its soldiers.

Instead of taking on international ventures alone, we are able to share the burdens of the work to stop bloodshed, reconstruct societies, police conflicts, train armies, provide legal frameworks, uphold governance standards and promote human rights. The creation of the United Nations is as timely now as it was 58 years ago.—Dawn/The LAT-WP News Service (c) The Los Angeles Times.

(The writer is director of the World Policy Institute at the New School University and author of ‘Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations.’)