Syed Ghous Ali Shah (L) Syed Qaim Ali Shah (R)
Syed Ghous Ali Shah (L) Syed Qaim Ali Shah (R)

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday suspended the operation of an order of the Election Commission of Pakistan that transferred an election petition against the victory of Sindh Chief Minister Syed Qaim Ali Shah over a provincial seat from the Karachi election tribunal to the Hyderabad election tribunal.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice Munib Akhtar gave the order on a petition of Syed Ghous Ali Shah, a leader of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz, against the ECP order.

The bench also issued a notice to the chief election commissioner, the ECP secretary, the chief minister, and the presiding officer of the Hyderabad election tribunal to file their respective comments by April 7 when the court would again take up the matter.

The CM had won the provincial assembly seat PS-29 in the 2013 general elections. His victory was challenged through an election petition filed by Syed Ghous Ali Shah, the rival candidate belonging to the PML-N, who emerged runner-up.

The PML-N candidate alleged massive irregularities in the elections and sought the chief minister’s disqualification. The election petition was filed initially at the Sukkur election tribunal headed by Zaheeruddin Leghari.

However, it was later transferred to the Karachi election tribunal presided over by Judge Zafar Ahmed Khan Sherwani, on the application of the chief minister, who alleged that the presiding officer of the Sukkur election tribunal was biased.

Expressing no-confidence in the head of the tribunal, he said that Mr Leghari was “biased” for being a mureed (disciple) of the Pir Pagara, the chief of the Pakistan Muslim League-Functional, an ally of the PML-N.

While the Karachi election tribunal had almost completed the proceedings of the election appeal, the chief minister once again expressed no-confidence in the presiding officer and petitioned the SHC against Judge Sherwani. However, the CM’s plea was thrown out.

Later, the CM moved another application in the ECP seeking transfer of the election petition against him to any other tribunal in the province. But Chief Election Commissioner retired Justice Sardar Mohammed Raza dismissed his questioning the credentials of the presiding officer.

The CM assailed the rejection of his transfer application by the ECP through a constitutional petition in the SHC that on Feb 21 ordered the ECP to revisit within 20 days its verdict of dismissing the CM’s plea seeking transfer of the election petition against him from the Karachi election tribunal.

On March 5, the ECP extended the tenure of eight election tribunals across the country. But, tenure of Judge Sherwani was not extended.

According to the counsel for the chief minister, Advocate Farooq H. Naek, Judge Sherwani, the presiding officer of the election tribunal who was a former judge of the SHC, was not impartial and had bias against his client. He said the chief minister had filed an application under Section 58 of the Representation of the Peoples Act, 1976, before the ECP, requesting it to transfer the election petition from the Karachi election tribunal to any other tribunal, but it was rejected.

Subsequently, the ECP revisited its decision following the direction of the SHC when it was approached by the chief minister.

In his fresh petition against the ECP order, Syed Ghous Ali Shah, represented by Advocate Aslam Bhutta, said that the chief election commissioner passed an order on the CM’s application on March 3, transferring the election petition against his victory to the Hyderabad election tribunal.

The counsel alleged that Mohammed Ashfaq Balouch, the presiding officer of the Hyderabad election tribunal, who had also served as district and sessions judge in Khairpur district, had a close relationship with the chief minister, adding that the presiding officer and his relatives were staunch supporters of the Pakistan People’s Party.

He said that the Karachi election tribunal had already reserved its judgement on the election petition after recording evidence and statements.

He stated that the presiding officer was biased against his client and party, and therefore, he pleaded to the court to set aside the ECP’s transfer order.

The counsel further asked the court to suspend the ECP notification whereby it extended the working period of all tribunals except the Karachi election tribunal from March 1 to April 30.

Published in Dawn, April 1st, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

The Dar story continues

The Dar story continues

One wonders what the rationale was for the foreign minister — a highly demanding, full-time job — being assigned various other political responsibilities.

Editorial

Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.
All this talk
Updated 30 Apr, 2024

All this talk

The other parties are equally legitimate stakeholders in the country’s political future, and it must give them due consideration.
Monetary policy
30 Apr, 2024

Monetary policy

ALIGNING its decision with the trend in developed economies, the State Bank has acted wisely by holding its key...
Meaningless appointment
30 Apr, 2024

Meaningless appointment

THE PML-N’s policy of ‘family first’ has once again triggered criticism. The party’s latest move in this...