Manmohan upset by court summons in coal scam

Published March 12, 2015
In this Wednesday, May 21, 2014 file photo, outgoing Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh leaves after paying homage to former Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi on his death anniversary, in New Delhi, India. — AP/file
In this Wednesday, May 21, 2014 file photo, outgoing Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh leaves after paying homage to former Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi on his death anniversary, in New Delhi, India. — AP/file
In this photograph taken on January 8, 2014, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh looks on during the opening ceremony of the 12th Pravasi Bharatiya Divas 2014 (Overseas Indian Conference) in New Delhi. — AFP
In this photograph taken on January 8, 2014, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh looks on during the opening ceremony of the 12th Pravasi Bharatiya Divas 2014 (Overseas Indian Conference) in New Delhi. — AFP

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Wednesday summoned former prime minister Manmohan Singh, former Coal Secretary P.C. Parakh and industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla and others as accused in a coal block allocation scam case.

“I am upset, but this is a part of life,” Dr Singh told reporters after the court ordered him to appear on April 8. “I am sure that the truth will prevail and I will get a chance to put forward my case with facts,” the former PM added.

Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar summoned the six accused for the alleged offences punishable for criminal conspiracy and criminal breach of trust by public servant, or by banker, merchant or agent under the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

If convicted, the accused are liable to be sentenced for a maximum of life imprisonment.

Rejecting the CBI’s plea for closing the case, Special Judge Prasahar asked all the accused persons to appear on the next date of hearing.

On January 20 this year, the CBI recorded the statement of Dr Singh in connection with alleged irregularities in the allocation of an Odisha coal block.

The CBI had earlier sought closure of the case. However, when the Special Judge pulled it up for filing a patchy probe report, it filed a revised one and took a U-turn, stating that “there is prima facie enough material on record” to prosecute Mr Parakh and Mr Birla.

Published in Dawn, March 12th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...
Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...