Investor ardour for real assets may grow too fervid

Published March 5, 2015
Physical assets offer an illiquidity premium which is alluring at a time when bond markets offer meagre returns. - Dawn photo/file
Physical assets offer an illiquidity premium which is alluring at a time when bond markets offer meagre returns. - Dawn photo/file

LONDON: Investors’ interest in physical assets such as real estate and infrastructure is surging. In a low-yield world, the yearning for higher returns is understandable. But the conditions are also in place for over-enthusiasm to lead to a mispricing of risk.

Six in 10 senior investment professionals plan to raise allocations to real assets, a BlackRock survey recently showed.

Norway’s central bank, which manages the country’s wealth fund — the largest in the world — said in February the institution should reduce its fixed income portfolio in favour of real assets. And Allianz Group said on Feb 26 it was raising its mid-term target for real asset-based financing by a third to 110 billion euros.

Physical assets offer an illiquidity premium which is alluring at a time when bond markets offer such meagre returns. A portfolio of buildings could yield a premium of around 250 basis points over government bonds, UBS Wealth Management research predicts. Premiums are currently up to 50 basis points higher because of depressed government bond yields.

Real assets have other advantages. They typically don’t move in lockstep with financial markets. And for those willing to tie their money up for a while, assets such as real estate and infrastructure can marry predictable cash flows with low volatility.

This is ideal for life insurers and pension funds which have longer investment horizons. Hence the $900 million purchase of the UK government’s 40 per cent holding in Eurostar by a Canadian manager of public pension funds and British asset manager Hermes.

But what happens when a horde of other asset managers muscle in on these relatively small and illiquid markets? Bottlenecks can easily develop, shifting the advantage to sellers.

True, the need for new and upgraded infrastructure in both emerging and developed markets will meet some of the increase in demand. However, government involvement in some infrastructure projects curbs volatility but brings regulatory risk. Infrastructure projects tend to be complicated and technology-dependent. Pricing operational and technical risks is not for novices. A sustained surge in interest could see an underpricing of some of the risks inherent in real assets.

Published in Dawn, March 5th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.