Zardari urges Sharif to allay concerns over 21st Amendment

Published January 12, 2015
PPP Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.—AFP/File
PPP Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif.—AFP/File

LAHORE: PPP Co-chairman and former president Asif Ali Zardari has urged Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to allay concerns of political parties which have expressed reservations over the 21st Amendment, saying the nation cannot afford divisions in its ranks at this critical time.

“After the Peshawar tragedy all political parties were united to fight against terrorism and this unity must not be damaged at this juncture,” Mr Zardari said while discussing the matter with PML-Q leaders Chaudhry Shujaat Husain, Pervaiz Elahi, Moonis Elahi and Salik Husain who had called on him at Bilawal House here on Saturday.

Also read: Establishing military courts has saved future generations: Zardari

The Jamaat-i-Islami, JUI-F and JUI-S have opposed the 21st Amendment and objected primarily to provisions in the law that allow taking up only the terror cases committed in the name of religion and sect.

PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has also criticised parliament for allowing the setting up of military courts.

Asif Zardari said: “It is the duty of the PML-N government to allay the concerns of JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman and others over the 21st Amendment. The war against terror cannot be won without unity. The political parties have taken difficult decisions for peace in the country and they must fully support the initiative to curb terrorism.”

He said: “We have voted for setting up military courts with good intention because we want eradication of terrorism from the country.”

Chaudhry Shujaat said the whole nation was supporting the army in the war against terrorism. “Despite differences, we supported the government for the sake of the national interests,” he said.

Aitzaz Ahsan has said that JI chief Sirajul Haq, Fazlur Rehman and JUI-S chief Samiul Haq had endorsed the setting up of military courts and other proposals at the All-Party Conference.

“Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan had proposed to get the signature of the participants of the APC on a proposed draft of National Action Plan which I opposed saying he should honour our words. Surprisingly these leaders backed off from their words after the passage of the 21st Amendment,” he said.

But the religious parties say that they don’t have much objection to military courts, but the definition of terrorism must not be confined to religion and sect.

“We’d made it clear to the prime minister in the APC that we’re not against military courts in the present situation, but the definition of terrorism must not be confined to religion and sect,” said the President of Jamiat Ahle Hadith, Prof Sajid Mir.

Published in Dawn, January 12th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.