PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court Bar Association (PHCBA) on Wednesday declared that the recent nominations for appointment of judges in the high court by the judicial commission was devoid of merit and therefore, it called upon the parliamentary committee not to endorse them and return them the commission for reconsideration.

The declaration was made during a meeting of the PHCBA general body, where PHCBA president Essa Khan, secretary general Ayaz Khan, Abdul Lateef Afridi, Peshawar District Bar Association president Raza Khan, Maulana Shamsul Haq, Muhim Afridi, Iftikhar Khan, Yar Said Khan and Khanzada Khan were noted participants.

The meeting through a unanimously adopted resolution turned down the nominations made by the judicial commission and demanded their reconsideration.

It said lawyers would take all possible steps for their demands.

The PHCBA also set up a protest camp in front of the high court’s building.

The association has convened a meeting of the presidents and general secretaries of all the district bar associations in the province on Thursday for evolving future course of action over the issue.

The judicial commission in its meeting, chaired by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Nasirul Mulk had on Oct 17 recommended four names for appointment as additional judges of the PHC. These names are referred to the Parliamentary Committee which after approval would be forwarded to the president of Pakistan for final notification.

The judicial commission has nominated three lawyers – Younas Taheem, Ghazanfar Khan and Haider Ali - and senior district and sessions judge Qalandar Ali Khan, as judges for the high court.

During the PHCBA general body meeting, the speakers said the lawyers’ movement was launched to uphold the rule of law and supremacy of the Constitution and that the movement was a continuous process.

They expressed reservations over the nominations for high court and asked the parliamentary committee to reject them and send them back to the commission for review.

Published in Dawn, October 23rd, 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...