PTI petition seeks PM’s disqualification

Published September 2, 2014
The supreme court of Pakistan. — File photo
The supreme court of Pakistan. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf opened on Monday a new legal front against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and sought his disqualification for allegedly misleading the National Assembly.

The PTI’s central committee leader Ishaq Khan Khakwani filed a petition in the Supreme Court through his counsel Advocate Irfan Qadir requesting the court to order disqualification of the prime minister for falsely stating in the National Assembly on Friday that he had not asked Chief of the Army Staff Gen Raheel Sharif to act as a mediator and guarantor between the government on one side and PTI Chairman Imran Khan and Pakistan Awami Tehreek chief Dr Tahirul Qadri on the other for ending the political impasse.

The petition said the prime minister later denied in the assembly that the army was dealing with such issues without the government desiring it to do so. By making two different statements, it alleged, Mr Sharif tried to malign and damage the fair image of the army in violation of Article 62 (g) of the Constitution.


PTI’s central committee leader Ishaq Khan Khakwani files a petition in the Supreme Court


The petition said that an army spokesman had confirmed that it was the government which had asked the army chief to play a role in resolving the standoff.

This established that Nawaz Sharif had made a false statement concerning the army chief and, therefore, was liable to be proceeded against under Article 62 (f) of the Constitution, it argued.

The article deals with the qualification of a member from becoming a parliamentarian if he is not sagacious, righteous, honest and Ameen.

The petitioner contended that Mr Sharif stood disqualified in view of a dictum laid down by the Supreme Court in a case relating to disqualification of former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani wherein it had directed the Election Commission to de-notify him as member of the National Assembly.

Besides Mr Sharif, the petitioner made the ECP as a respondent and said that since the matter was of great public importance, it required determination by a validly constituted SC bench.

Meanwhile, Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk has issued a court roster for the current week fixing cases before different benches comprising the existing 16 judges of the Supreme Court in Islamabad.

Published in Dawn, September 2nd , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...