Former spokesman takes Khattak to court

Published August 28, 2014
The petitioner claimed the chief minister had offered him on July 24, 2013 to join him as spokesman and media adviser and that the offer was based on his merits, including 25 years journalistic experience, which had international recognition.
 — File photo
The petitioner claimed the chief minister had offered him on July 24, 2013 to join him as spokesman and media adviser and that the offer was based on his merits, including 25 years journalistic experience, which had international recognition. — File photo

PESHAWAR: A former spokesman and media adviser of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister on Wednesday moved the Peshawar High Court against his ex-boss, Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf chief Imran Khan and some government officials for withholding nine months salary and appointment notification.

In the petition, Mohammad Shiraz Paracha requested the court to declare that he was exploited by denial of salary and withholding of the appointment notification and salary cheques with mala fide intent.

“Through a conspiracy, the period of nine months of his service was reduced to four months, while the Rs0.3 million monthly salary was mitigated to Rs0.2 million without giving any reason.”

The petitioner claimed the chief minister had offered him on July 24, 2013 to join him as spokesman and media adviser and that the offer was based on his merits, including 25 years journalistic experience, which had international recognition.


Paracha insists bureaucracy withheld his salary, appointment notification


He said he used to attend confidential and exclusive meetings of the chief minister and secretariat.

Paracha said he projected plans and policies of the provincial government through local, national and international media.

He said his distinctive credentials were disliked by some bureaucrats, who began raising barriers in the issuance of notification by applying traditional tactics of red-tape.

The petitioner said on repeated insistence of the chief minister, the draft notification of his appointment was prepared and was approved by him.

He said the chief minister took him to Imran Khan along with his educational documents and experience certificates and he, too, approved the appointment.

Paracha said unfortunately, bureaucracy was stronger than political government of the province and that then director (information) Behramand Jan was in fact handling all ministerial authorities as then information minister Shah Farman was alien to the information technology.

He said there was administrative helplessness in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa due to the non-cooperation of local bureaucracy and too much interference of the central leadership of the ruling party.

The petitioner claimed though notification of his appointment existed in ‘mysterious corridors’ of the provincial secretariat, the notification did not reach him as Imran Khan wanted to appoint Najiullah Khattak.

He said the idea of a media cell was conceived and Najiullah was enlisted there when all selection formalities were over and inclusions was not possible.

Paracha alleged that to adjust the ‘unqualified stranger’ in the chief minister’s team as the chief of the media cell, many amendments were made to the selection process; experience people in the information ministry were ousted, and shortlisted to accommodate favourites of Imran Khan.

He claimed the chief minister was a shadow chief executive of the province as all appointments to government positions were made by PTI chief Imran Khan.

The petitioner said he worked as the chief minister’s spokesman for nine months but not a single penny was paid to him though the agreed salary was Rs0.3 million per month.

He said instead of the agreed salary, the then director (information) manoeuvred to persuade then information minister Shah Farman to pay him the four months mitigated salary only.

Paracha said a cheque for a four months labour was approved by the chief minister, the accountant general office and the information department, but he was not paid salary.

He said he decided to resign on May 30, 2014 before he was subjected to the ‘humiliation’ of the media cell appointment by the back door.

The petitioner said though his resignation was not formally accepted, someone was appointed the chief minister’s spokesman or media adviser.

Published in Dawn, August 28th, 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...