ISLAMABAD: While hearing a petition filed by a district and sessions judge against his repatriation to Punjab, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) will examine the appointment of two other judges who were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary along with the petitioner.

Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) judge Atiqur Rehman, additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) Kamran Basharat Mufti and District and Sessions Judge (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah had joined the Islamabad Judicial Service on deputation in 2011 in BS-22.

The IHC authorities sent (DSJ) Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah back to the Punjab Judicial Service on April 9, 2013.

In its notification, the IHC administration said the DSJ Syed Muzaffar Ali Shah’s services were no longer required and he was being repatriated to his parent department as additional district and sessions judge in BS-20.

Shah through his counsel Syed Javed Akbar challenged the order of the IHC for sending him back to his parent department that too in lower grade.

His counsel adopted before the IHC Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui that on March 17, 2011, IHC administration committee decided to absorb the Atiqur Rehman from Bloachistan, Kamran Basharat Mufti from Punjab and the petitioner Shah.

Upon having option from the Petitioner, IHC made a request to the Lahore High Court (LHC) on March 21, 2011 for issuance of a no objection certificate for purpose of absorption of the petitioner in the subordinate judiciary of Islamabad.

After completing all the requirements, Shah, Mufti and Rehman were absorbed in the Islamabad judiciary on March 28, 2011.

In April last year the petitioner was sent back to the parent department on the pretext that he was not absorbed in accordance with the rules.

The petitioner subsequently relinquished the charge on April 11 and after a considerably long period of 3 months and 6 days, LHC administration allowed him to join Punjab Judicial Service as ADSJ.

The counsel alleged that the judge was not given due process of hearing at a proper forum for redressal of his grievances and was condemned unheard.

He requested the court to set aside the order for his repatriation enabling the petitioner to resume his work in Islamabad judiciary as DSJ.

The court however asked him to name Judge Rehman and ADSJ Mufti as parties in the petition and adjourned the matter.

Opinion

Editorial

Dubai properties
16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

DUBAI, with all its glitter and glamour, has long been a destination of choice for wealthy individuals looking to...
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...