IHC returns Musharraf’s petition

Published
0

ISLAMABAD: The registrar office of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday returned the petition of former president retired General Pervez Musharraf he had filed before the court on Tuesday seeking his trial in high treason case under Army Act.

The registrar office held that since the special court, seized with his high treason trial, has rejected the identical petition for transferring the high treason case to the military court therefore being the appellate forum such petition could only be filed in the Supreme Court.

Three members bench of the special court headed by Justice Faisal Arab of Sindh High Court (SHC) on February 21, 2014 rejected the plea for transferring the high treason case to the military court.

In it ruling, the special court said: “the offences under the High Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973 are exclusively triable by the special court established under the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Act, 1976 as its Section 3 (2) ousts the jurisdiction of all other courts.”

It may be mentioned that prior to the commencement of special court’s proceedings on December 23, 2014 IHC single bench had already dismissed the same petition.

IHC Justice Riaz Ahmed Khan had held that the special court had taken cognizance of the matter and that Article 6 of the constitution under which the federal government had filed the complaint against Musharraf has overriding effect on the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 hence the trial could not be transferred to the military court.

In the petition, Gen Musharraf through his lawyers contended that he imposed the emergency on November 3, 2007 as Chief of Army Staff therefore the military court was the relevant forum for his trial for any alleged offence.

The petition said three retired military officers -- Gen Khalid Muneer Khan, Gen Muzaffar Afzal and Gen Khalid Zaheer -- who retired between 2004 and 2008 from the army and now facing prosecution under the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), had their cases transferred to the army court under Section 7 of the Pakistan Army Act.

It further said that the government was trying to deprive Gen Musharraf of his fundamental right to a fair trial as enshrined in Article 10-A and Article 25 of the constitution by not transferring his case to the military court.

Opinion

Editorial

Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...
A voice in care
10 Oct, 2026

A voice in care

WORLD Mental Health Day this year carries a compelling message. The theme, ‘Lived experiences heard: real voices,...
Midterm break
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

Midterm break

Both the US and Israel need to halt their destructive misadventures in the Middle East.
American barbarism
Updated 10 Oct, 2026

American barbarism

WITH the spectre of defeat in the upcoming midterm elections looming large over the Trump administration, the...