US assails planned release from Afghan prison

Published
0

KABUL: The United States on Wednesday criticised the planned release of 88 suspected militants from an Afghan jail, branding the men as “dangerous individuals” who could threaten security as Nato forces withdraw from the country.

Disagreement over the fate of the prisoners is the latest point of friction between US and Afghan authorities who are stuck in a bitter stalemate over a security accord that would allow some US troops to stay after 2014.

Bagram jail was finally handed over to Afghan control by the US in March after a public stand-off with President Hamid Karzai, who has presented the jail as a symbol of Afghanistan’s efforts to regain its national sovereignty.

Many of those still held in Bagram are suspected high-level Taliban and Al Qaeda militants, and the US has long been concerned that Afghanistan’s weak and corruption-prone security forces could allow them to return to the battlefield.

“The Afghan Review Board has exceeded its mandate and ordered the release of a number of dangerous individuals who are legitimate threats,” Colonel Dave Lapan, a spokesman for US forces in Afghanistan, said in a statement.

“Based on the evidence and the risk these individuals pose to the peace and security of the Afghan people... their cases should be addressed by the formal Afghan justice system.”

The review board last year ordered the release of 648 prisoners, of whom 560 have been freed. The US is disputing the release of the final 88.

The 12-year war in Afghanistan is increasingly unpopular in the US, and often fraught relations between Kabul and Washington have again worsened over Mr Karzai’s refusal to sign the security accord.

Some analysts believe the Afghan government hopes that the Bagram prison releases could help kick-start moribund peace talks with the Taliban who were ousted from power in 2001.

This year will see the end of the US-led Nato combat mission in Afghanistan as 85,000 foreign troops pull out, though the security accord would allow several thousand US soldiers to remain to train and advise Afghan security forces.

Signing the agreement is a precondition for the delivery of billions of dollars in Western aid for Afghanistan.

A leaked US intelligence assessment said this week that progress in Afghanistan was likely to be seriously eroded by 2017 even if some US troops stay and Western powers continue to support Kabul financially.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...
Prudent warning
Updated 25 Oct, 2026

Prudent warning

Muslim countries have warned against a new conflict. But will the war lobbies in Washington and Tel Aviv listen?
Party of one
25 Oct, 2026

Party of one

IT ill behoves a political party that claims to be the biggest and most popular in the country to be so mired in...
Reckless driving
25 Oct, 2026

Reckless driving

THERE is a lack of official data documenting the crisis, but even by the most conservative estimates, over a dozen...