WASHINGTON, Nov 25: The deal that eases US-led sanctions on Iran can also benefit Pakistan’s effort to buy gas from the neighbouring country but only if Washington agrees to help.

The agreement that Iran and six world powers signed in Geneva on Saturday for capping Tehran’s nuclear programme, include a set of voluntary measures that the United States and its European allies agreed to undertake.

In one such measure, they agreed to “suspend US and EU sanctions on Iran’s petrochemical exports, as well as sanctions on associated services”.

Another measure requires the United States and its allies to “pause efforts to further reduce Iran’s crude oil sales, enabling Iran’s current customers to purchase their current average amounts of crude oil”.

The measure also commits these Western powers to “suspend, for such oil sales, the EU and US sanctions on associated insurance and transportation services”.

Diplomatic observers in Washington say that such clauses could be expanded to allow Pakistan to build the 2,775 km pipeline, which can bring 40 billion cubic metres of natural gas per year when fully functional.

They point out that since under the Geneva deal, the United States has agreed to ease sanctions on the Iranian oil industry, the concession should also apply to the gas project.

They also argue that since Pakistan signed the pipeline project before the Geneva agreement, it can be included on the list of Iran’s “current customers”.

The then Iranian and Pakistani presidents signed the deal for building the pipeline on March 11, 2013. The project is to be completed in 22 months with Iran’s financial support.

The observers also say that the easing of “US sanctions on associated insurance and transportation services” should allow international and Pakistani companies to participate in the pipeline project.

But the same observers also acknowledge that Washington would only “accept this pro-Pakistan interpretation of the Geneva deal if it wants to help Pakistan cope with its energy crisis by allowing it to import gas from Iran”.

“Otherwise, the Americans can also use counter arguments to show that the Geneva deal is not applicable to Pakistan,” said one observer.

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...