KABUL, Nov 11: The Afghan Taliban on Monday warned an upcoming elders’ assembly against endorsing a deal allowing US troops to stay in Afghanistan after 2014, saying they would be punished as “traitors” if they did so.

Around 2,500 tribal elders and civil leaders are expected to take part in an assembly known as a ‘loya jirga’ this month, to decide whether to accept the draft Bilateral Security Agreement between Afghanistan and the US.

The Taliban, who have led an insurgency against President Hamid Karzai’s government and its Nato military backers since being ousted from power in 2001, warned against accepting the pact.

“The Afghanistan Islamic Emirate warns all the participants that if they endorse this document, the Islamic Emirate will enlist all the participants as traitors and target each member individually,” the Taliban said in a statement.

The draft pact was hammered out in Kabul last month by the US Secretary of State John Kerry. But he left without a final deal as Afghan President Hamid Karzai said only a jirga had the authority to decide the contentious issues.

These include a US demand to retain legal jurisdiction over its troops in Afghanistan, which would give them immunity from Afghan law. The request emerged as the main sticking point after Kerry’s visit.

If approved by the assembly, tentatively set for Nov 19-21, the draft will be submitted to parliament.

If the agreement is passed by both loya jirga and parliament, between 5,000 and 10,000 US troops would stay in Afghanistan to help fight Al Qaeda remnants and train the national army.

The US had been pushing for the deal to be signed by the end of October to allow the Nato coalition to plan the withdrawal of its 87,000 combat troops by December 2014 after 13 years of fighting the Taliban insurgency.

The collapse of a similar security agreement with Iraq in 2011 led to the US pulling all its troops out of the country, which is currently suffering its worst sectarian violence since 2008.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...
Trump rebuked
Updated 06 Jun, 2026

Trump rebuked

OBSERVERS across the world have long questioned the utility of Donald Trump’s now three-month-old war on Iran. But...
Hostile water motives
06 Jun, 2026

Hostile water motives

INDIA’S latest move to advance the Chenab-Beas Link Tunnel Project and its plan to flush silt from the Salal Dam...
Polio progress
06 Jun, 2026

Polio progress

PAKISTAN’S latest sub-national polio campaign offers encouraging evidence that the country can still push back...