JOINT statements issued after a meeting between heads of government are often dull, turgid affairs with plenty of official-speak and a regurgitation of official talking points. The joint statement released after President Barack Obama met Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif stuck to the conventional formula: first, a paragraph on shared democratic values; next two short ones – in substance too – on the so-called enduring partnership between the two countries; after that, the purported meat – six paragraphs on the theme of economic growth and aid for the energy and social sectors; then the subject everyone else believes is the crux of the relationship: defence cooperation, counterterrorism, non-proliferation and nuclear security, and regional cooperation. To the credit of both the White House and the Pakistani prime ministerial delegation, the emphasis on trade, the economy and uplift of the social sector rang genuine – this was not just an attempt to talk a good talk in public, while keeping the tough, more acrimonious talk for meetings away from the cameras and microphones.

But then The Washington Post story on what Pakistani officials have known until very recently about the drone programme in Fata landed with a thud and instantly changed the subject – and has raised all manner of very uncomfortable questions. Quite who – or even which side – is behind the leak is far from clear as yet. The Post report refers to both “top-secret CIA documents and Pakistani diplomatic cables”, meaning the leak could have emanated from either of those two circles, and so possibly has nothing to do directly with the Obama White House. Even so, Mr Obama himself did not exactly shirk from giving a matter-of-fact assessment of the difficulties in going from the mutually expressed desire to build more sustainable ties to actually achieving that kind of relationship between the US and Pakistan. But then, neither did Mr Sharif really try to downplay the terrorism threat inside Pakistan nor did he look to overly blame the outside world for Pakistan’s internal troubles.

Perhaps the raw reality of the Pakistan-US relationship is that while the two countries continue to cooperate because they need each other, neither has any illusions anymore that the two sides can be close friends. Mr Obama is willing to engage Pakistan on the economic and aid fronts, but the terrorism and militancy issues are as urgent and real as they have ever been. Which is why Mr Sharif’s real job awaits him on his return from D.C.: getting to grips with the internal security challenges.

Opinion

Editorial

Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...
Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.