MUZAFFARABAD, Sept 12: The Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) government on Thursday announced it would hold the long due local bodies (LB) polls on party basis in April next year.

However, critics in opposition as well as within the ruling People’s Party were sceptical about the seriousness of the government in this regard, recalling a similar two-year old proclamation.

“The People’s Party government has decided to hold local bodies elections after 22 years under the previous (LB) system in order to transfer powers at the grassroots level and solidity of democracy and democratic institutions,” said Chaudhry Mohammad Yasin, AJK’s senior minister for local government and rural development (LG&RD).

“The local governments coming into existence as a result of LB polls will address concerns of people regarding civic amenities without any delay besides serving as nurseries for democracy,” he said.

The last LB polls were held in AJK in 1991 during the Sardar Abdul Qayyum Khan led Muslim Conference government.

However, when next LB polls became due in 1995, the MC government put them in abeyance, reportedly to avert friction in its ranks ahead of 1996 general elections.

Soon after assuming office in July 1996, the then Barrister Sultan Mahmood led People’s Party government also announced to hold LB polls on party basis on November 16, the same year.

According to official sources, Rs 4.6 million surety was deposited by the candidates throughout AJK. However, the polls were cancelled apparently for correction of voter lists but in effect to avoid any risks in the wake of dissolution of Benazir Bhutto government in Islamabad. That surety has not been refunded to the candidates to this day.

Ever since 1995, the charge of LB institutions is being given by every government to ‘administrators’ who are either government officials or ruling party leaders.

The senior minister claimed that compilation of electoral rolls, appointment of election commissioner for local bodies and allied staff, and demarcation of wards would be completed within the next six months to hold the LB polls in April 2014.

However, main opposition Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) said it took the minister’s announcement with a pinch of salt because the PPAJK government had so far proved that it did not believe in honouring its commitments.

Khawaja Farooq Ahmed, vice president of ruling PPAJK, also expressed doubt that the government would honour its latest announcement, which was also party’s commitment in the election manifesto.

“Unfortunately, Chaudhry Abdul Majeed led government’s performance has been abysmally poor and this announcement seems to be a stunt to divert attention from that and also to give a lollipop to disheartened party workers,” said the rebel leader.

He said the sincerity of the government would become clear after provision of funds to the Election Commission for compilation of computerised electoral rolls.“Otherwise, it would be yet another hoax.”

It may be recalled that in October 2011, Mr Yasin had told a press conference in Mirpur that the LB polls would be held after six months.

Opinion

Editorial

Weathering the storm
Updated 29 Apr, 2024

Weathering the storm

Let 2024 be the year when we all proactively ensure that our communities are safeguarded and that the future is secure against the inevitable next storm.
Afghan repatriation
29 Apr, 2024

Afghan repatriation

COMPARED to the roughshod manner in which the caretaker set-up dealt with the issue, the elected government seems a...
Trying harder
29 Apr, 2024

Trying harder

IT is a relief that Pakistan managed to salvage some pride. Pakistan had taken the lead, then fell behind before...
Return to the helm
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Return to the helm

With Nawaz Sharif as PML-N president, will we see more grievances being aired?
Unvaxxed & vulnerable
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Unvaxxed & vulnerable

Even deadly mosquito-borne illnesses like dengue and malaria have vaccines, but they are virtually unheard of in Pakistan.
Gaza’s hell
Updated 28 Apr, 2024

Gaza’s hell

Perhaps Western ‘statesmen’ may moderate their policies if a significant percentage of voters punish them at the ballot box.