JIT divided over status of two missing men

Published August 13, 2013
The Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo
The Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The joint investigation team (JIT) set up for recovery of missing people is divided over the enforced disappearance after the Military Intelligence (MI) and Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) refused to entertain two missing people in the category of enforced disappearance.

During the hearing of missing people’s case, Additional Attorney General Tariq Mehmood Khokhar submitted a progress report before a two-member bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justice Ejaz Chaudhry and Justice Gulzar Ahmed.

According to the report prepared by Khanewal District Police Officer Mohammad Ayaz Saleem about two missing people — Abdul Rehman of Karachi and Ghulam Sajjad Ahmed of Kabirwala — all members of JIT, except ISI and MI, are of the view that it is a case of enforced disappearance. But members of the ISI and MI presented dissenting notes saying it was not a case of enforced disappearance.

The ISI and MI, in their identical notes of dissent, said that after carrying out a detailed ground check and examining circumstantial evidence, cross-questioning witnesses and the petitioner, the ISI was of the view that it was not a case of enforced disappearance.

Other members of the JIT, including local police and officials of the Intelligence Bureau (IB), differ with the ISI and MI, arguing the case falls in the category of enforced disappearance.

According to the report, Ahmed went missing in April 2011 from Khanewal. The FIR for his disappearance was registered with Sarai Sidhu Khanewal police station on May 5 last year.

The FIR registered against Rehman alleged that after a bomb blast in April 2011, Rehman was taken into custody by unknown people.

His whereabouts remained unknown until Mohammad Hanif recorded a statement before the Khanewal DPO this month and informed him that he had met Ghulam Sajjad Ahmed in 2009 when he was detained by the army.

Hanif, however, was unsure about his place of detention as he said he had been kept moving from one place to another blindfolded.

Abdul Rehman, the other missing person, was picked up by the unknown men in 2011 after his brother was booked by Faisalabad police the same year under the Anti Terrorism Act (ATA) 1997 and Explosives Act.

The court bench termed the progress report for the recovery of missing people unsatisfactory and directed police authorities to file a comprehensive report in a fortnight.

The hearing of the case was adjourned till the submission of another report.

Opinion

Editorial

Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...
Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...