Worrying portent

Published October 9, 2012

VIOLENCE has become an unfortunate component of Pakistani politics. And when political meetings and rallies become easy targets for trigger-happy assailants, the need to reform the country’s political culture assumes even more importance. A number of people were killed as gunmen opened fire on a village public meeting on Sunday in Sindh’s Khairpur district. The majority of victims were PPP supporters. There are mixed views about what prompted the attack with some officials citing the cause as enmity between two groups of the local Janwari community. However, PPP MNA Nafisa Shah, who was to speak at the meeting, indicated ‘political motives’. Given intra-communal tensions and a charged political atmosphere, neither aspect can be ruled out. Political tensions have been prevailing since the passage of the Sindh People’s Local Government Bill 2012 by the provincial assembly last week, with Sindhi nationalists and some erstwhile PPP allies in the assembly agitating against the new law. If the meeting was attacked due to political motives, it would set a dangerous precedent. One can only hope that the police are right when they say they know the perpetrators; in that case we expect the assailants to be apprehended soon. To clear the air, all political forces in Sindh need to condemn the attack unequivocally, whatever their view of the government. Criticism of government policies must remain within the bounds of democratic practice — either in the assembly chamber or through peaceful protests.

With general elections on the horizon electioneering activities will begin to gather steam in the days ahead. In this context it is not very reassuring that a meeting of the ruling party has been attacked in its home base. Considering the possibility of similar incidents, political parties need to sit down and discuss a code of conduct whereby it is agreed that electioneering will be a peaceful exercise. If the trend of attacking political rallies and meetings catches on, an excuse can be made to curtail political activities altogether. This would be unacceptable. Hence both political parties and the state need to play their respective roles to ensure a peaceful run-up to the elections.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

WHILE launching the Economic Survey 2026, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told a hopeful story of economic...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...