spot-fixing scandal, match-fixing scandal, mohammad amir, mohammad asif, salman butt, icc hearing, cricket scandal, news of the world, mazhar majeed, doha, qatar, qatar financial centre, michael beloff, London's Westminster Magistrates' court, Judge Howard Riddle, Howard Riddle, Sally Walsh, Southwark Crown Court, Gareth Peirce,
Mohammad Amirr (C) arrives at Westminster Magistrates court in central London, on March 17, 2011. -Photo by AFP

LONDON: Three Pakistan cricketers, accused of taking bribes to fix parts of a test match in England last year, told police the incidents were coincidental or bad luck, a London court heard on Thursday.

The trio, former captain Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif and Mohammad Amir, are accused by British prosecutors of spot-fixing or rigging the match by bowling no-balls at pre-agreed times during the fourth test at Lord's last August.

“There is no doubt that the allegations are very serious. I know you understand that,” Judge Howard Riddle told the men at a hearing at London's Westminster Magistrates' court.

Along with a fourth man, sporting agent Mazhar Majeed, the three players, who appeared in court wearing dark suits and dark open-necked shirts, face charges of conspiracy to obtain and accept corrupt payments, and conspiracy to cheat.

Prosecutor Sally Walsh told the court Butt and Amir had said in police interviews that money which had been found was from appearances at an ice-cream parlour owned by Majeed.

Butt told detectives the no-balls were coincidental and Amir said they were the result of bad luck because the ground had been slippery, Walsh said.

The men were ordered to appear again at London's Southwark Crown Court on May 20 and were given unconditional bail, while Majeed was ordered to surrender his passport.

Riddle said, while Britain had no extradition treaty with Pakistan, any failure to show up for future court hearings would end their careers.

“Failing to attend these proceedings will destroy playing international cricket in the future,” he said, describing the men as being of good character.

“Their reputation is of the utmost importance. They have a very strong incentive to attend trial and to defend this.”

LENGTHY BANS

In addition to the criminal case, the men have been given lengthy bans after having been found guilty of corruption by the International Cricket Council.

They have all lodged appeals against the bans with the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Amir's lawyer Gareth Peirce said her client had had to deal with problems with British immigration in order to attend Thursday's hearing.

“He got here overcoming considerable odds. Immigration authorities managed to lose his application,” Peirce told the court, saying Amir's whole future depended on the trial.

“Mr Amir has gone the extra mile to ensure he is here.”

Meanwhile, Asif's lawyer said the evidence against his client was weak, neither indicating he was part of a conspiracy nor that he had received any money.

If found guilty of the charges, the men face prison sentences of up to seven years.

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...